Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584
------- Additional Comments From rbhalera(a)redhat.com 2008-02-20 04:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
Hi all,
Please remember the following points:
1. There is no need to integrate all the indic fonts on earth in the fonts-indic
packages. If different fonts are released by different groups it is much easier
to manage separate packages (multi-source multi-project srpms are a maintenance
hell, you never know what release number or license to use). So please track the
original source of every font you want added and propose them separately.
True. I think fonts-indic should be marked for removal now. Its better to handle
fonts grouping in comps. As of now most of the fonts (Indic, arabic,hebrew etc.)
are packaged according to the upstream projects, all separated. So fonts-indic,
fonts-hebrew etc. are not useful anymore.
Thanks for this link.
<snip>
The only block on including more fonts in Fedora right now is lack of
people
working on font packaging, new package review is usually blinding fast, so if
you know one or several font you'd like in packaging them directly will be
faster and easier than opening bugs on existing packages
As I observe, people have started taking interest in font packaging. I hope
things will improve soon.
@Ani(or smc guys),
Instead of a link to srpm, can you provide a link to upstream sources of either
the font files or the tarballs? btw, I assume we were waiting for a latest bug
free release of these font.So just wait for a while, I will handle the packaging
and review by next week.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.