Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera@redhat.com ReportedBy: smaitra@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: smaitra@redhat.com, rbhalera@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=346638) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346638) Proper Image Shape of 0C39 - HA.
Description of problem: Telugu Character 'HA' (0C39) showing wrong shape when composed with another consonant as a below-base character.
One of the example is : U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C39 (there are many like this)
The nearest hand-drawn shape image is attached here for primary reference.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11 pango-1-24.1-1.fc11
How reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start system with FC11 or Latest 2. Change the ibus with RAWCODE 3. Open Gedit 4. Type the combination's Unicode as given above. 5. Observe the lower part of the composed character.
Actual results: Its wrongly showing.
Expected results: It should be like the image attached here!
Additional info: See the attachment.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smohan@redhat.com |b.rahul.pm@gmail.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|b.rahul.pm@gmail.com |psatpute@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b.rahul.pm@gmail.com, | |petersen@redhat.com Component|fonts-indic |lohit-fonts AssignedTo|psatpute@redhat.com |b.rahul.pm@gmail.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
--- Comment #3 from Satyabrata Maitra smaitra@redhat.com 2009-06-29 03:10:51 EDT --- Hi Jens
Is this bug now again assigned to rahul? I see some info like this, in history where his gmail id has been given. Just curious! :)
Satya
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute@redhat.com AssignedTo|b.rahul.pm@gmail.com |psatpute@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kkrothap@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com 2009-08-19 01:17:46 EDT --- Satyabrata,
I will work on this, adding krishnababu in cc
Krishababu,
can you please update me on this with respect to lohit-telugu-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
--- Comment #5 from Krishna Babu K kkrothap@redhat.com 2009-08-19 02:44:06 EDT --- Hi Pravin,
As Satya said the 0C39 - HA(హ) is been showing wrong shape when composed with another consonant or with the same consonant as a below-base character.
And he has mentioned the version-release number of lohit-telugu-fonts. Please let me know if you require any other information.
thanks, Krishnababu.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|lohit-fonts |lohit-telugu-fonts Version|11 |rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com 2009-09-16 06:30:43 EDT --- same issue is addressed in bug 504270 as well so closing as a DUPLICATE
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 504270 ***
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org