Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-03-27 10:47:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8)
What is the purpose of CJK specific fontconfig rules, and why is it necessary for CJK to behave differently than non-CJK when dealing with CJK-glyphs?
Do C, J and K fontconfig rules differ from each other?
CJK is a mess because Chinese, Japanese and Korean use the same codepoints, but the expected glyphs shapes are different depending on the language you type.
The problem exists to a lesser extent for arabic.