Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617
Caolan McNamara <caolanm(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |caolanm(a)redhat.com
Component|sazanami-fonts |openoffice.org
Version|10 |rawhide
AssignedTo|tagoh(a)redhat.com |caolanm(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #15 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-30 07:46:47 EDT
---
I'm now back to very suspicious about OOo itself. Both fontforge and ttx are
preferring the type 2 coverage format when saving this font as its more compact
in this case that the original fonts type 1 coverage table. Presuming that both
ttx and fontforge are re-encoding as type 2 correctly then it would be OOo
that's handling them incorrectly.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/CHAPTER2.htm has "Coverage Index
(GlyphID) = StartCoverageIndex + GlyphID - Start GlyphID" which *plausibly* is
somewhere we're going wrong.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.