Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #43 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-04-30 01:08:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41)
the key difference is not to separate them from the standard fontconfig files, but to make only one set of files linked under a given locale. sure you probably don't not necessarily follow ubuntu's way, but the idea, a (set of) locale-specific fontconfig settings is missing for cjk in fedora (at least for ja).
Yes, I know. and fontconfig is capable to do that with the language-specific overrides rule. it can constructs the font list from them and works similarly unless the simple priority list rule prevents.
then please propose a better solution, which can avoid overriding in both ways.
I do ;) can you point out any cases that the language-specific overrides rule doesn't work instead? I should asked you same question but I didn't get the certain reply for my comment #34 yet though.
can you explain what do you mean by "simple priority list"? are you referring to 65-nonlatin? or are you referring to font-specific config files? if it is the latter case, we are talking about the same thing.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_list...
We are talking about the same thing? I don't think so since you apparently dislikes it and you are proposing to do that outside fontconfig for single language but not to make happier with all of CJK and non-CJK languages with English locale say at once.
(In reply to comment #42)
and also can you tell me why you can not the following config file to vlgothic-fonts to make it a preferred fonts for ja locale?
Sorry? can you point out what's difference between the above and current vlgothic-fonts' config? it looks similar to me except it's provided separately because those are subpackaged. and I don't really like to contain the font name not owned.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig> <alias> <family>sans-serif</family> <prefer> <family>DejaVu Sans</family> <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family> <family>VL PGothic</family> </prefer> </alias> <alias> <family>monospace</family> <prefer> <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family> <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family> <family>VL Gothic</family> </prefer> </alias> </fontconfig>
Whether or not this works properly really depends on the order of the config files, which isn't the right direction to go.