Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510
Warren Togami wtogami@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fangqq@gmail.com)
--- Comment #8 from Warren Togami wtogami@redhat.com 2009-03-27 10:29:06 EDT --- Do statements like "quality is not impressive" have agreement from our Japanese developers? This might very well be true, but we need to avoid the appearance of cultural favoritism.
First, pango can not tell if "日本語" are Japanese Kanji or Chinese Hanzi, while PANGU_LANGUAGE is not defined under non-CJK language, so, pango will not mark the character with the proper language tags, and some CJK specific fontconfig rules will be bypassed.
What is the purpose of CJK specific fontconfig rules, and why is it necessary for CJK to behave differently than non-CJK when dealing with CJK-glyphs?
Do C, J and K fontconfig rules differ from each other?
- update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more troubles if it
stay the way it is.
What do you suggest for this?