Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578015
--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-03-30 20:44:36 EDT --- This is the logs what I get from behdad so far: <##fonts:tagoh> behdad: not sure why we use binding="same" in the patte rn editing for lang specific thing <##fonts:behdad> tagoh: if the goal is to alias differing names of equi valent fonts, we want same binding <##fonts:behdad> otherwise it doesn't really work
The main purpose of this rule isn't to get the exact alias right, because there are no fonts has certain glyph coverages for everything. and what we are expecting here would be to apply the certain fonts partially for the languages. I see same binding is still useful if one wants to replace AAA font to BBB font say.