https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Lukas Ruzicka lruzicka@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lruzicka@redhat.com Flags| |needinfo?(tagoh@redhat.com)
--- Comment #3 from Lukas Ruzicka lruzicka@redhat.com --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #2)
Apparently that testcase is outdated. the latest one would be https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/status/36.html though, it isn't reflected packages from langpacks. I'm updating the list for other purpose. sorry for inconvenience.
Hello, coming back to this bug once again. We have this test failing again because it seems that the font list on the system differs from what we expected.
What the system tells us: Sans -> NotoSansArabic-VF.ttf: "Noto Sans Arabic" "Regular" Serif -> NotoNaskhArabic-VF.ttf: "Noto Naskh Arabic" "Regular" Mono -> Vazirmatn[wght].ttf: "Vazirmatn" "Regular"
What the table provides and what we expect: Sans -> NotoNaskhArabic-VF.ttf "Noto Naskh Arabic" "Regular" Serif -> NotoNaskhArabic-VF.ttf: "Noto Naskh Arabic" "Regular" Mono -> PakTypeNaskhBasic.ttf: "PakType Naskh Basic" "Regular"
Can you tell us, what the correct combination is for Fedora 37 and if the tables are correct, why there are different defaults on the installed system?
thanks.