[Bug 1786199] New: build of google-roboto-fonts for EPEL 8
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786199
Bug ID: 1786199
Summary: build of google-roboto-fonts for EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: google-roboto-fonts
Assignee: dtardon(a)redhat.com
Reporter: breno(a)tembosocial.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dtardon(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
I would like to ask a build of google-roboto-fonts for EPEL 8.
Would you mind requesting the branches and build them?
I've built them myself for testing, no issues at all.
Please, let me know if I can be of any help.
Thank you very much.
- Breno
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 3 months
[Bug 1788778] New: fonttools-4.2.3 is available
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788778
Bug ID: 1788778
Summary: fonttools-4.2.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 4.2.3
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.2.2-1.fc32
URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 3 months
[Bug 1791404] New: DejaVu font packages have wrong URL
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791404
Bug ID: 1791404
Summary: DejaVu font packages have wrong URL
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Component: dejavu-fonts
Severity: low
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: matt(a)nightrealms.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
peter(a)thecodergeek.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The DejaVu font packages currently point to http://dejavu-fonts.org/, which is
now an ad-laden parked domain. It should point to the current DejaVu project
URL, https://dejavu-fonts.github.io/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 3 months
[Bug 1787668] New: fonttosfnt update required for converting bitmap
fonts to OTB
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787668
Bug ID: 1787668
Summary: fonttosfnt update required for converting bitmap fonts
to OTB
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: xorg-x11-font-utils
Assignee: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: airlied(a)redhat.com, ajax(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jglisse(a)redhat.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com,
negativo17(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
fonttosfnt needs a few fixes and improvements from upstream
and maybe upstream's pull requests to properly generate
*.otb files from legacy bitmap font files.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xorg-x11-font-utils-7.5-42.fc31.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. fonttosfnt -b -c -g 2 -m 2 -o terminusn.otb ter-u*n.bdf
Actual results:
Weird spacing with the *.otb font.
Expected results:
Proper spacing with the *.otb font.
Additional info:
The details can be found at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753295 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748495
which I will summarized them properly in this bug later, but
first we need a bug for this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 3 months
[Bug 1542331] Please update for for new version
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542331
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(psatpute(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
+1 with what nim says.
* Unfortunately upstream has remained unpredictable with release pattern. Good
to ask once upstream about their plan from release perspective.
* If they are going to follow same release pattern in future, good to go as per
guidelines, infact this is good refresh for paktype after sometime.
Thanks Vishal for taking this up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 3 months