[Bug 682677] New: Wrong thinkness for letter 'u'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Wrong thinkness for letter 'u'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682677
Summary: Wrong thinkness for letter 'u'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: fabian+redhat(a)greffrath.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Fabian Greffrath <fabian+redhat(a)greffrath.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
External Bug ID| |Debian BTS 616620
Created attachment 482628
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=482628
See the attached screenshot I took from the SPON website, especially the word
"um"
Originally reported by Michael Biebl to the Debian Bug Tracking System, see
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616620>:
Hi,
since upgrading ttf-liberation from 1.05.2.20091019-4 to
1.06.0.20100721-1, the letter 'u' and 'U' has become much "thiner" in
comparison to other letters. See the attached screenshot I took from the
SPON website, especially the word "um".
I downgraded to the squeeze version again and the problem is gone, so
this is a regression of the new upstream release.
Cheers,
Michael
> Is only the sans variant affected or also the serif one?
Hard to say, as the serif letter is completely different. I only recognized
this
with the sans version.
I have to add, that I use LCD, RGB, and full hinting
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 3 months
[Bug 683122] New: [pa_IN] Default font is not lohit punjabi
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [pa_IN] Default font is not lohit punjabi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683122
Summary: [pa_IN] Default font is not lohit punjabi
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: caolanm(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
aalam(a)redhat.com, jsingh(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ltinkl(a)redhat.com,
dtardon(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Depends on: 682716
Classification: Fedora
Clone Of: 682716
Created attachment 482937
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=482937
implement suggestion
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #682716 +++
fontconfig-2.8.0-3
fc-match on "pa" gives different results than "pa-in".
$ fc-match :lang=pa
Lohit-Punjabi.ttf: "Lohit Punjabi" "Regular"
$ fc-match :lang=pa-in
DroidSansArabic.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular"
fontconfig knows about "pa" and "pa-pk", because "pa-in" isn't an exact match
it considers the full list of pa + pa-pk fonts and returns one of that set
fairly arbitrarily, better would be to return a "pa" more generic version when
there's no exact territory match.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months
[Bug 673813] New: Archaic "Berling Antiqua" has an alternative name field of "Times New Roman"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Archaic "Berling Antiqua" has an alternative name field of "Times New Roman"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673813
Summary: Archaic "Berling Antiqua" has an alternative name
field of "Times New Roman"
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: caolanm(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 476067
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476067
fc-match -v "Times New Roman"
Description of problem:
Archaic "Berling Antiqua" has an alternative name field of "Times New Roman". I
guess here that there's arguably no bug seeing as the font *does* name itself
Times New Roman in one of its name fields, but it is a real nuisance as it gets
preferred above e.g. Liberation Serif if you have the misfortune to install it
How reproducible:
100%
Actual results:
fc-match "Times New Roman"
berling.ttf: "Times New Roman" "Normal"
Expected results:
Ideally we could somehow blacklist/scrub the "Times New Roman" name from
"Berling Antiqua"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months
[Bug 569340] New: Hangul Jongseong wrong rendering in GTK applications.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Hangul Jongseong wrong rendering in GTK applications.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569340
Summary: Hangul Jongseong wrong rendering in GTK applications.
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=397040)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=397040)
hangul jongseong text
Description of problem:
Hangul Jongseong wrong rendering in GTK applications.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.27.1-1.fc13
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
gtk2-2.19.6-1.fc13.x86_64
glib2-2.23.4-1.fc13.x86_64
fontconfig-2.8.0-1.fc13.x86_64
freetype-2.3.11-2.fc13.x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months
[Bug 694387] New: typo in -b option in help
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: typo in -b option in help
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694387
Summary: typo in -b option in help
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fonttools
AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
"boundig" in " -b Don't recalc glyph boundig boxes: use the values in the
TTX
file as-is." should be "bounding".
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonttools-2.3-2.fc14.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.ttx --help
2.
3.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 648362] New: Nepali Language Variant of Jha
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Nepali Language Variant of Jha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648362
Summary: Nepali Language Variant of Jha
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-devanagari-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ujjwol(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 456794
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=456794
Nepali specific optional jha
Description of problem:
Nepali language in most cases uses the devangari northern variant jha but
sometimes a specific Nepali variant of jha is also used. Please support for
that. I have attached one rough/okay glyph of that.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Remember this is used in some cases only, in normal case devanagari northern
variant is used.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 698599] New: mapping on Latin-1 supplement is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mapping on Latin-1 supplement is broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698599
Summary: mapping on Latin-1 supplement is broken
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: motoya-lmaru-fonts
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
even if the font itself doesn't have a glyph being assigned to the certain code
point, other one appears there and totally get scrambled at the Latin-1
supplement.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
motoya-lmaru-fonts-1.00-0.1.20100928git.fc14.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.run gucharmap
2.select MotoyaLMaru
3.see Latin-1 supplement
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 10 months
[Bug 698601] New: mapping on Latin-1 supplement is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mapping on Latin-1 supplement is broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698601
Summary: mapping on Latin-1 supplement is broken
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: motoya-lcedar-fonts
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
even if the font itself doesn't have a glyph being assigned to the certain code
point, other one appears there and totally get scrambled at the Latin-1
supplement.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
motoya-lcedar-fonts-1.00-0.1.20100928git.fc14.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.run gucharmap
2.select MotoyaLCedar
3.see Latin-1 supplement
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 10 months
[Bug 659365] New: FontForge: Stack-based buffer overflow by processing specially-crafted CHARSET_REGISTRY font file header [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FontForge: Stack-based buffer overflow by processing specially-crafted CHARSET_REGISTRY font file header [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659365
Summary: FontForge: Stack-based buffer overflow by processing
specially-crafted CHARSET_REGISTRY font file header
[fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: jlieskov(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: kevin(a)tummy.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 659359
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora
versions.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the
respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product.
Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available.
Bodhi update submission link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=659359
Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora.
Only one tracking bug has been filed; please only close it when all
affected versions are fixed.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 10 months
[Bug 690593] New: ghostscript-fonts contains non-free font files
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghostscript-fonts contains non-free font files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690593
Summary: ghostscript-fonts contains non-free font files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghostscript-fonts
AssignedTo: twaugh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jwboyer(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: twaugh(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
The following files contain a non-free license:
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchb.afm
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchb.pfa
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchbi.afm
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchbi.pfa
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchr.afm
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchr.pfa
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchri.afm
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/bchri.pfa
The license of these fonts is:
% Copyright 1990 as an unpublished work by Bitstream Inc., Cambridge, MA.
% All rights reserved.
% Confidential and proprietary to Bitstream Inc.
% U.S. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED RIGHTS
% This software typeface product is provided with RESTRICTED RIGHTS. Use,
% duplication or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions
% as set forth in the license agreement and in FAR 52.227-19 (c) (2) (May,
1987),
% when applicable, or the applicable provisions of the DOD FAR supplement
% 252.227-7013 subdivision (a) (15) (April, 1988) or subdivision (a) (17)
% (April, 1988). Contractor/manufacturer is Bitstream Inc.,
% 215 First Street, Cambridge, MA 02142.
% Bitstream is a registered trademark of Bitstream Inc.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghostscript-fonts-5.50-23.fc12
ghostscript-fonts-5.50-24.fc15
Additional info:
This content should likely be removed from the tarball.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 10 months