Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: xinsun(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=344553)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344553)
0BB8-0BC2.jpg
Description of problem:
When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit, the results were
wrong.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge
2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit.
Actual results:
The result are
U+0BB8 U+0BC2 ஸூ
U+0BB9 U+0BC2 ஹூ
and they are different from the correct images.
Expected results:
Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC2.jpg and 0BB9-0BC2.jpg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357
Summary: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: mathml-fonts
AssignedTo: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
1. Please split the package so different upstreams with different licenses and
different levels of unicode compliance are not mixed toguether
(esp. since http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/ now recommends *not*
installing some of them)
2. Please make sure the result is conformant with the latest font packaging
guidelines and current fc-cache behaviour
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template
3. Please document the result on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Packaged_fonts
using
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template template
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272
Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong
shape in Composition
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: smaitra(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=346638)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346638)
Proper Image Shape of 0C39 - HA.
Description of problem:
Telugu Character 'HA' (0C39) showing wrong shape when composed with another
consonant as a below-base character.
One of the example is : U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C39 (there are many like this)
The nearest hand-drawn shape image is attached here for primary reference.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11
pango-1-24.1-1.fc11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start system with FC11 or Latest
2. Change the ibus with RAWCODE
3. Open Gedit
4. Type the combination's Unicode as given above.
5. Observe the lower part of the composed character.
Actual results:
Its wrongly showing.
Expected results:
It should be like the image attached here!
Additional info: See the attachment.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373
Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 446451
Classification: Fedora
We advocate building fonts from sources but do not do it for lohit which is a
Red Hat/Fedora font project.
Please make the lohit package generate fonts from sfds (as the dejavu people
showed, regular building from sources helps improve both fonts and font tools)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Segmentation fault.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404
Summary: Segmentation fault.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
$ gdb fontforge
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/fontforge
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams.
Executable based on sources from 00:23 GMT 28-Aug-2008.
Library based on sources from 23:33 GMT 27-Aug-2008.
[New Thread 0xb7fdf700 (LWP 11925)]
Help! Server claimed font
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--13-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing.
I may crash soon.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00479f79 in GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x83d6ce8, as=0xbfffd148, ds=0xbfffd144,
ld=0xbfffd140) at gdrawtxt.c:2328
2328 *as = fontinfo->ascent;
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install e2fsprogs.i386 libICE.i386
libSM.i386 libXau.i386 libXcursor.i386 libXdmcp.i386 libXfixes.i386
libXrender.i386
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00479f79 in GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x83d6ce8, as=0xbfffd148,
ds=0xbfffd144, ld=0xbfffd140) at gdrawtxt.c:2328
#1 0x004bb00c in GTextFieldFit () at gtextfield.c:2596
#2 _GTextFieldCreate (gt=0x83cc0a8, base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe41c,
data=0x83d0830, def=0x4fdf60) at gtextfield.c:2692
#3 0x004bb912 in GTextCompletionCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe41c,
data=0x83d0830) at gtextfield.c:2732
#4 0x004cb015 in _GHVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe5bc, data=0x0,
hcnt=1, vcnt=3, def_box=0x4fe440) at ghvbox.c:573
#5 0x004cb26d in GVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0x0, data=0x0)
at ghvbox.c:607
#6 0x00484d6e in GGadgetsCreate (base=0x83a8328, gcd=0xbfffe5b8)
at ggadgets.c:1172
#7 0x004834fa in GFileChooserCreateChildren () at gfilechooser.c:1525
#8 GFileChooserCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe818, data=0x0)
at gfilechooser.c:1571
#9 0x004cb015 in _GHVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffec18, data=0x0,
hcnt=1, vcnt=4, def_box=0x4fe400) at ghvbox.c:573
#10 0x004cb182 in GHVGroupCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffec18, data=0x0)
at ghvbox.c:633
#11 0x00484d6e in GGadgetsCreate (base=0x83a8328, gcd=0xbfffec14)
at ggadgets.c:1172
#12 0x0815b15e in FVOpenFont (title=0x81c20e0 "Open Font", defaultfile=0x0,
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
mult=1) at openfontdlg.c:736
#13 0x08109f84 in GetPostscriptFontName (dir=0x0, mult=1) at fontview.c:1102
#14 0x0810a1f4 in MenuOpen (base=0x0, mi=0x0, e=0x0) at fontview.c:1142
#15 0x0819dbf4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff554) at startui.c:1131
$ dmesg | grep fontforge
fontforge[11659]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfe4b4a0 error 4 in
libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000]
fontforge[11676]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfd76240 error 4 in
libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000]
fontforge[11682]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfb3eb40 error 4 in
libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000]
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20080828-1.fc10
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. $fontforge
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: dejavu lgc serif condensed italic gets confused with condensed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505129
Summary: dejavu lgc serif condensed italic gets confused with
condensed
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: belegdol(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
There are some problems with DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed Italic font, which make
it unavailable to gtk font selector and fc-list.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start gedit
2. Go to edit → preferences → fonts and colours
3. Uncheck system fonts usage, start font selector
4. Pick dejavu lgc serif
Actual results:
There are two “Condensed” entries in the styles box, but there is no condensed
italic.
Expected results:
Condensed and Condensed Italic are both present once.
Additional info:
[jsikorski@snowball ~]$ rpm -ql dejavu-lgc-fonts | grep Serif
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif-Bold.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif-BoldItalic.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif-Italic.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed.ttf
[jsikorski@snowball ~]$ fc-list | grep LGC | grep Serif
DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Italic
DejaVu LGC Serif,DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed:style=Condensed,Book
DejaVu LGC Serif,DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed:style=Condensed Bold Italic,Bold
Italic
DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Bold
DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Book
DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Bold Italic
DejaVu LGC Serif,DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed:style=Condensed Bold,Bold
nim-nim found out the following:
[nim@arekh ~]$ fc-query /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf
|grep style:
<nim-nim> style: "Condensed"(s) "Book"(s)
<nim-nim> [nim@arekh ~]$ fc-query
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf |grep style
<nim-nim> style: "Condensed Oblique"(s) "Oblique"(s)
He said that this could be some “Oblique” vs “Italic” problem. Also, bug
#466678 might be related, but I'm not sure about that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478747
Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: doxygen
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 446451
Classification: Fedora
Doxygen adds font files to the documentation it generates. This pauses problems
to Fedora as fonts are bulky and can have conflicting legal constraints.
Duplicating the same font files in every doxygen-produced documentation just
exacerbates the problem.
Please stop distributing fonts within doxygen, and let the system manage fonts
for you.
See also bug #477402 and the referenced upstream bug
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345
Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font
has error.
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
In rhel 5.3,in gedit input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with RAW CODE,the font
has error
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386
pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64
pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64
pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386
pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386
pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit and input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE
2.The font is different from
http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCa…
205
3.All other fonts from U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95----to U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD
U+0CB9 all have errors compared with
http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCa…
from 205 to 238.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
I will attach the result created in gedit.
Please compare them with
http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCa…
from 205 to 238.
They are different.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506436
Summary: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
The U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit input U+0C9C U+0CC4 ಜೄ
2.The font shape is not correct.
Actual results:
The font shape is not correct
Expected results:
Additional info:
I will attach the correct font image
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887
Summary: FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version
of Kurier-Regular.otf
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: zhoujingmiller(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When the font attached is opened in FontForge and TrueType option is selected
in "Generate Fonts" in FontForge, FontForge segfaults.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontforge-20090224-2.fc11.i586
Kurier-Regular.otf as is shipped in TeX Live 2008
How reproducible:
Open the font attached with FontForge, and select "Generate Fonts" in "File".
Choose "TrueType" option, and click on "Save". Then FontForge segfaults.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the font attached with "fontforge <path_to_the_attached_font>"
2. Click on File
3. Click on Generate Fonts
4. Select TrueType in export type.
5. Click on "Save".
Actual results:
FontForge segfaults.
Expected results:
FontForge does not segfault and Kurier-Regular.ttf is generated in the expected
location.
Additional info:
Vide attachment please.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.