Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(john.brown009@gma
| |il.com)
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-11-06 16:04:02 EDT ---
The spec file is now clean
The font is also clean
However it seems I had forgotten to check your fontconfig file (bad bad tired
reviewer) and it is not clean:
A. please make sure it conforms to the latest basic template in
fontpackages-devel
B. please make sure you use the actual font name in it (can check it with
fc-cache). Fontconfig can only act on the name the font files declares, so for
your rules to work you need an exact match
C. Please make sure you use the correct generic family for this kind of font
(see fontconfig-generics.txt in fontpackages-devel)
D. It's probably not a good idea to put the font at 60, since it lacks bold,
italic, etc variants. Let fonts with more variants claim the first places, and
increase your prefix value (see fontconfig-priorities.txt in
fontpackages-devel)
Anyway that's nice progress on your part, just the last mile to go now
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532377
Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh
| |at.com
Component|nspluginwrapper |pango
AssignedTo|stransky(a)redhat.com |besfahbo(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-11-06 11:46:24 EDT ---
Thread 1 (Thread 15349):
#0 0x00506e3e in __libc_malloc (bytes=14) at malloc.c:3657
ignore1 = <value optimized out>
ignore2 = 1
ar_ptr = 0x60c380
victim = <value optimized out>
__func__ = "__libc_malloc"
#1 0x05c416b5 in IA__g_malloc (n_bytes=<value optimized out>) at gmem.c:131
mem = <value optimized out>
#2 0x05c5bcfe in IA__g_strjoinv (separator=<value optimized out>,
str_array=<value optimized out>) at gstrfuncs.c:2641
i = 1
len = <value optimized out>
separator_len = <value optimized out>
string = <value optimized out>
ptr = <value optimized out>
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "IA__g_strjoinv"
#3 0x00bd40d6 in pango_font_description_from_string (
str=<value optimized out>) at fonts.c:1164
i = <value optimized out>
families = 0x8dc6c70
desc = 0x8d9faa0
p = <value optimized out>
last = <value optimized out>
len = <value optimized out>
wordlen = 6
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "pango_font_description_from_string"
#4 0x0575f755 in _gtk_style_init_for_settings (style=<value optimized out>,
settings=<value optimized out>) at gtkstyle.c:389
font_name = 0x8d67320 "Lucida Grande Medium 10"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084
User tl changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|50314,53223,69108,79037,10|50314,53223,69108,75472,79
is|5085 |037,105085
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification