[Bug 477418] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 4 months
[Bug 525870] New: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts
accurately
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately. Samplers such as
http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
collect incomplete info
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Get a F11 or rawhide system
2. Install our fonts # yum -y install $(repoquery --whatprovides "font(*)")
3. List them $ fc-list : family |sort
4. Open http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
5. Let the applet run, check its result
Actual results:
The java-detected font list is incomplete (for example it's missing STIX) and
does not use the same names at fontconfig
Expected results:
The same list in both cases
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 477606] New: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: rpmlint
AssignedTo: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: wolfy(a)nobugconsulting.ro, tmz(a)pobox.com,
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Our current font packaging policy requires the installation of TTF/OTF/PFA/PFB
fonts in a subdirectory of %_fontbasedir
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages
Our general packaging policy demands of packagers to create proper font
packages when their app bundles them
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
If an app or bit of code is not fontconfig-aware, it can always package
symlinks pointing to fonts packaged according to our guidelines in
%_fontbasedir space, and depend on the font package providing those files.
A recent audit run revealed that the number of packages bundling fonts is very
high. (repoquery found 159 packages shipping fonts in rawhide, the 2/3rds not
being font packages, see bug #477044)
In many case their packagers were not even aware they were bundling fonts (bug
#477406#c4). Some of them are licensing problems (477384#c4)
To prevent such problems in the future, rpmlint should flag any package that
installs ttf/otf/pfa/pfb fonts outside the %_fontbasedir tree, or bundle those
files with binaries in /usr/bin, /usr/lib?? and such.
Packages that include symlinks to files in the %_fontbasedir tree are ok,
though they should also get a warning so upstream adds fontconfig support to
its code (since it has near universal adoption and continuing to ignore
fontconfig will only add to the packager problems in the long run)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/34322/focus=34335
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 6 months
[Bug 505764] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped
with a2ps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: file
AssignedTo: dnovotny(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, dnovotny(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are
"PostScript document text"
They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64
Full list:
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmbi-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmri-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 6 months
[Bug 519317] New: AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317
Summary: AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dchen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
I have done two clean installs of Fedora 11, x86_64 and i386 respectively.
Both are using "Traditional Chinese" during the install process and apply the
latest update after installation.
I take a look at the font size and DPI setting on both of them and they are the
same as listed below:
應用程式字型:Sans,10
文件字型: Sans,10
桌面字型: Sans,14
視窗標題字型:Sans Bold 10
固定寬度字型:Monospace 10
解析度:96 DPI
Then I open "gucharmap" and search the character "糓" (U+7CD4).
Change the font size to 12, 11 and 10.
The i386 version works quite well.
However, the display on the x86_64 one become messy.
And the following warning message appear on the terminal:
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 12', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 11', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 9.9990234375',
text='糔'
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always in x86_64
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open "gucharmap" and
2. search the character "糔" (U+7CD4).
3. Change the font size to 12, 11 and 10.
Actual results:
Display on the x86_64 one become messy.
And the following warning message appear on the terminal:
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 12', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 11', text='糔'
(gucharmap:1997): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output.
shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light 9.9990234375',
text='糔'
Expected results:
Character '糔' should be displayed properly without triggering Pango warning.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 6 months
[Bug 517635] New: [ne_NP] fc-match showing "Lohit Hindi" instead of current Language
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ne_NP] fc-match showing "Lohit Hindi" instead of current Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Summary: [ne_NP] fc-match showing "Lohit Hindi" instead of
current Language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
in Nepali Envirnment (gnome-desktop), fc-match is showing following informating
---
$echo $LANG
ne_NP.UTF-8
$fc-match
lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular"
---
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-nepali-fonts-2.4.0-2.fc12
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. login to Gnome-desktop with Nepali Language
2. open gnome-terminal
3. type 'fc-match'
Actual results:
lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular"
Expected results:
lohit_ne.ttf: "Lohit Nepali" "Regular" or something for Nepali
Additional info:
I have file /usr/share/fonts/lohit/lohit_ne.tff on system
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 6 months
[Bug 518161] New: "contains" expression seems not working on the fontconfig rule
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: "contains" expression seems not working on the fontconfig rule
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
Summary: "contains" expression seems not working on the
fontconfig rule
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=357904)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=357904)
sample fontconfig rule
Description of problem:
Even if the pattern contains strings that the rule specifies with "contains"
expression, it doesn't match.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc12
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.install lohit-hindi-fonts and lohit-marathi-fonts
2.put the attached rule into /etc/fonts/conf.d
3.fc-match "sans-serif:lang=mr"
4.fc-match "sans-serif:lang=mr-in"
Actual results:
3. lohit_mr.ttf: "Lohit Marathi" "Regular"
4. lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular"
Expected results:
the result of 3 and 4 should be:
lohit_mr.ttf: "Lohit Marathi" "Regular"
Additional info:
>From a debug log:
FcConfigSubstitute test pattern any lang Contains "mr"
FcLangSet mr-in contains mr
Missing bitmap ku-am
No match
I'm not really sure why fontconfig refers ku-am map here but apparently it
looks like fontconfig doesn't know what mr-in is.
Anyway, if no explicit lang pattern is given and applications calls
FcDefaultSubstitute(), lang will be set like mr-in from current locale
mr_IN.UTF-8 say.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 6 months
[Bug 487581] New: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581
Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining
Diacritical Marks.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: adam.buchbinder(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009020911 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.6
According to the bug on freedesktop.org (link below), Liberation Mono has an
incorrect spacing definition for "Combining Diacritical Marks"; they should
have zero space, and should render above the last letter, not the next one.
Paste following text with selected font:
Correct: accent above o
Incorrect: accent above g
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enter a string with a combining diacritic mark in Liberation Mono, e.g.,
"o̍g". Don't use gnome-terminal; it relies on vte, which doesn't handle
combining characters. Use something like gedit; switching fonts will reveal the
issue as the diacritical mark switches places.
Actual Results:
The diacritic appears one letter to the right of where it should be.
Expected Results:
The diacritic should appear in the proper place.
I'm using ttf-liberation 1.04.93-1 on Ubuntu Intrepid; I'm filing this as an
upstream bug. If this should be filed elsewhere, please let me know.
I'm filing this because several monospace fonts have incorrect spacing for
"Combining Diacritical Marks":
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20330
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Bug 485569] New: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485569
Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
After various font rpm churn on rawhide my 32 bit application would crash with
a malloc failure because of a messed up font cache.
One could wonder:
a) why is the 32 bit cache different from the 64 bit?
b) why isn't fontconfig keeping them both uptodate?
but I have a simpler request:
"man fc-cache" states:
Note that fc-cache must be executed once per architecture to generate
font information customized for that architecture.
but it isn't possible to do this on x86_64 because only the 64 bit version of
/usr/bin/fc-cache is installed, even if both i386 and x86_64 fontconfig rpms
are installed.
** Request that /usr/bin/fc-cache-64 and /usr/bin/fc-cache-32 both be
installed, and that a new /usr/bin/fc-cache shell script be created that runs
them both.
The man page also says:
On a subsequent run, fc-cache will augment the cache information
files with the information for the new architecture.
but apparently this didn't work through some series of font rpm upgrades.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cd /var/cache/fontconfig
2. rm *
3. fc-cache
Actual results:
Only *x86-64.cache-2 files created
Expected results:
Both *x86.cache-2 and *x86-64.cache-2 files created
Additional info:
Any ugly workaround to the current situation is:
rpm -e --nodeps --allmatches fontconfig fontconfig-devel
yum install fontconfig.i386
fc-cache
yum install fontconfig.x86_64 fontconfig-devel.x86_64
fc-cache
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 506262] New: X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262
Summary: X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face
/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: cjkuni-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jreznik(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=348110)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348110)
xorg.log
Description of problem: X server crashes while using it...
FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x4e89b6]
1: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x6f) [0x47d63f]
2: /lib64/libc.so.6 [0x7f6271639370]
3: /usr/bin/X(FindGlyphRef+0x2c) [0x51e90c]
4: /usr/bin/X(FindGlyphByHash+0x28) [0x51ef78]
5: /usr/bin/X [0x52b279]
6: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x384) [0x446ee4]
7: /usr/bin/X(main+0x3b5) [0x42d0d5]
8: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7f6271624a2d]
9: /usr/bin/X [0x42c559]
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting
Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
at http://wiki.x.org
for help.
Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional
information.
rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc
error: file /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: No such file or directory
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch
cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.1.901-1.fc11.x86_64
Steps to Reproduce:
1. use X server
Actual results:
Crash
Expected results:
No crash
Additional info:
Sorry for report missing any details but I'm unsure how to reproduce and what
caused crash... I'll update it if I'll find something useful.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months