Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662
--- Comment #18 from Runa Bhattacharjee <runab(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-30 00:01:39 EDT ---
Tested for xchat-gnome-0.26.1-5.fc12 and the bug still exists.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Author: danken
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7234
Added Files:
dead.package
Removed Files:
fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec sources
Log Message:
fonts-hebrew-fancy end of life
--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
due to strict font packaging rules, fonts-hebrew-fancy has to be replaced by
culmus-fancy-anka-fonts
culmus-fancy-comix-no2-fonts
culmus-fancy-dorian-fonts
culmus-fancy-gan-fonts
culmus-fancy-gladia-fonts
culmus-fancy-ktav-yad-fonts
culmus-fancy-ozrad-fonts
as described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913#c2
unfortunately, this has not yet been done (oct 2009)
--- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec DELETED ---
--- sources DELETED ---
Author: danken
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7141
Added Files:
dead.package
Removed Files:
fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec sources
Log Message:
fonts-hebrew-fancy end of life
--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
due to strict font packaging rules, fonts-hebrew-fancy has to be replaced by
culmus-fancy-anka-fonts
culmus-fancy-comix-no2-fonts
culmus-fancy-dorian-fonts
culmus-fancy-gan-fonts
culmus-fancy-gladia-fonts
culmus-fancy-ktav-yad-fonts
culmus-fancy-ozrad-fonts
as described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913#c2
unfortunately, this has not yet been done (oct 2009)
--- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec DELETED ---
--- sources DELETED ---
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your ipa-gothic-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 17 18 19
ipa-gothic-fonts ipa-gothic-fonts 1 1 1
Total 1 1 1
17. Fonts with partial script coverage
☛ Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be
accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they
could be made useful to more people with only a little effort.
To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and
look for lines like: script-id¹(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints }
For example “mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }” means fontconfig will accept the tested
file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added.
If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary
for a particular script, report the problem upstream².
¹ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
² https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig
18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage
☛ Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to
fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more
people with only a little effort.
The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font
may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode
revision is published¹.
To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only
works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf).
¹ http://www.unicode.org/charts/
19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks
☛ Fontforge's fontlint¹ test suite found problems in some files included in
the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange
behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that
reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them
fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time.
You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users
¹ http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html
Please take the appropriate measures to fix the ipa-gothic-fonts package.
I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran.
Your friendly QA robot,
--
repo-font-audit
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your ipa-mincho-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 17 18 19
ipa-mincho-fonts ipa-mincho-fonts 1 1 1
Total 1 1 1
17. Fonts with partial script coverage
☛ Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be
accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they
could be made useful to more people with only a little effort.
To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and
look for lines like: script-id¹(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints }
For example “mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }” means fontconfig will accept the tested
file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added.
If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary
for a particular script, report the problem upstream².
¹ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
² https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig
18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage
☛ Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to
fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more
people with only a little effort.
The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font
may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode
revision is published¹.
To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only
works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf).
¹ http://www.unicode.org/charts/
19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks
☛ Fontforge's fontlint¹ test suite found problems in some files included in
the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange
behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that
reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them
fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time.
You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users
¹ http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html
Please take the appropriate measures to fix the ipa-mincho-fonts package.
I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran.
Your friendly QA robot,
--
repo-font-audit
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages