Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Pango multilib conflict on F10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479386
Summary: Pango multilib conflict on F10
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: stransky(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package pango-devel.i386 0:1.22.3-1.fc10 set to be updated
---> Package pango.i386 0:1.22.3-1.fc10 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Dependencies Resolved
==============================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version
Repository Size
==============================================================================================================================
Updating:
pango i386 1.22.3-1.fc10
updates 375 k
pango-devel i386 1.22.3-1.fc10
updates 327 k
Transaction Summary
==============================================================================================================================
Install 0 Package(s)
Update 2 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total size: 701 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
===================================================== Entering rpm code
======================================================
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoMarkupFormat.html from install of
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-querymodules.html from install of
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
Error Summary
-------------
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install pango.i386 on x86_64
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478695
Summary: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mcepl(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=328111)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328111)
Backtrace from crashed firefox
Description of problem:
When running wikipedia search in Ctrl-K query dialog in Firefox, firefox
crashed with the attached backtrace.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firefox-3.0.5-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
xulrunner-1.9.0.5-1.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
happened once
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: pango update i386 conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475233
Summary: pango update i386 conflicts
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jes(a)trained-monkey.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
A system initially installed with Fedora 7 and then upgraded, most recently to
F10, I hit the following error with today's updates:
Test Transaction Errors: file
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoMarkupFormat.html conflicts between
attempted installs of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 and
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-querymodules.html conflicts between
attempted installs of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 and
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Manually removing pango-devel.i386 makes the problem go away.
dwmw2 wanted me to report this, so you can blame him for the bug :-)
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: font size isn't restored upon login
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473903
Summary: font size isn't restored upon login
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: francis.earl(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When I first log in to an Xsession, my fonts are all about 6pt when they should
be 9pt. When I launch the Appearance settings, they are restored to my
settings. This appears to be true with all fonts. It is also true of all GTK
apps, and aMSN at least.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.6.0-3.fc10
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Log into X
2. Notice fonts are wrong
3. Go to fix them, watch them magically fix themselves w/o interaction
Actual results:
Fonts are not restored through sessions immediately
Expected results:
The fonts I select should remain.
Additional info:
I am using the default "Sans" font, size 9. GDM is set at 1024x768 while the
users session is 1280x1024. It appears to be using the GDM settings for the
Xsession despite the change in resolution. This is rarely also displayed by
panels rendering by dimensions of the old resolution, despite being able to use
the rest of the screen (somewhat) normally (just have to move things around the
panel...)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466595
Summary: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*).
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: xorg-x11-fonts
AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Current fc-cache makes fonts.cache files in /var/cache/fontconfig/.
then xorg-x11-fonts packages have needess ghost files.
$ rpm -ql xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 | grep fonts.cache
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-1
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-2
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-3
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-4
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-5
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-6
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-7
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-8
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-9
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
7.2-6.fc9
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
fontconfig-2.6.0-2.fc10
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281
Summary: Provides: freetype2-devel
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ed(a)membled.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
It would be handy if the freetype-devel package had Provides: freetype2-devel
for compatibility with other rpm-based distros.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391191
Summary: wrong verify options in rpm package for fonts.dir
Product: Fedora
Version: f8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fonts-KOI8-R
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: chkr(a)plauener.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
the integrity check for the fonts-KOI8-R-* packages reports modified files:
"rpm -V fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-10.fc8 fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-1.0-10.fc8
fonts-KOI8-R-75dpi-1.0-10.fc8":
S.5....T /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc/fonts.dir
S.5....T /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/100dpi/fonts.dir
S.5....T /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/75dpi/fonts.dir
Although this is not a big problem, rpm -V should not report changes in files
which are changed automatically on purpose (like fonts.dir, ...).
Other font packages have solved the problem e.g. using something like this in
the %files section (
%{fontdir}/*.ttf
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
e.g. fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-1.0-10.fc8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370441
Summary: subpixel on by default?
Product: Fedora
Version: f8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dwinship(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
I've noticed various places using subpixel hinting in F8:
- the installer
- the graphical boot screen
- gdm
(I've noticed, because they're using the wrong RGB ordering for my monitor, and
so it looks awful.)
I'm assuming that none of these apps are doing it on purpose, and that the
problem is just with the default settings. (And then once I log in, everything
is fine, because GNOME overrides the defaults.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041
Summary: [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Need to add fontspecific fontconfig rule file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-fonts-2.4.1-1.fc12
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
No fontconfig rule for Malayalam font
Expected results:
Should have fontconfig rule for Malayalam font
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563
Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=343739)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343739)
corret font shape
Description of problem:
In gedit input 0DB8+0DDA with RAW CODE,the font
shape is not correct.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit input U0DB8+U0DDA with RAW CODE
Actual results:
The font shape is not correct.
Expected result:
The font shape should be correct.
Additional info:
Please see the attachment of correct font and error font
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.