[Bug 450847] New: Evince crashes in freetype
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450847
Summary: Evince crashes in freetype
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: bart.vanbrabant(a)zoeloelip.be
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When keeping evince open all the time and continuously opening pdf documents all
evince instances crash. I'm not sure of the number of document to open but it's
something between 10 and 20. I'm writing a large latex document and after every
compile the make file opens the pdf again which causes evince to reload the pdf.
Freetype turns up at the top of the backtrace so I filled it against freetype.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cairo-1.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64
evince-2.22.2-1.fc9.x86_64
freetype-2.3.5-4.fc9.x86_64
------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant(a)zoeloelip.be 2008-06-11 07:13 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=308919)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308919&action=view)
Stacktrace from crash
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 444240] New: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240
Summary: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: keiths(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The freetype library in Fedora 8 and rawhide believes that the font hrger.pfa
(and related) are broken. freetype-2.1.9-6.el4 and freetype-2.2.1-19.el5 both
work (/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa is identical in all cases,
from the ghostscript-fonts-5.50.x packages).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.3.5-3.fc8 (rawhide checked, too)
ghostscript-fonts-5.50-18.fc8
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. gcc `freetype-config --cflags` ft.c `freetype-config --libs`
2. run resultant executable
3.
Actual results:
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: NO WORKY: error = 3
(error 3 is "broken file"/Ivalid_Format)
Expected results:
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: WORKY
Additional info:
------- Additional Comments From keiths(a)redhat.com 2008-04-25 18:34 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=303832)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303832&action=view)
testcase
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 433559] New: Inexact font match produces different results between i386, x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433559
Summary: Inexact font match produces different results between
i386,x86_64
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
With dejavu and bitstream fonts installed, but freefont not installed, "fc-match
freesans" (also "fc-match sans") produces a different results on i386 than on
x86_64.
At first I thought this caused doxygen/graphviz to generate different results on
each platform which caused the file conflicts in multiarch installs. Bug
#432683. It could have been, but in this case "sans" from dejavu and bitstream
produce identical images. Its more likely that one of the build platfoms has
freefont installed, which does produce different images.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum list 'dejavu*' 'bitstream*' 'freefont*'
2. fc-match freesans
3.
Actual results:
Installed Packages
bitstream-vera-fonts.noarch 1.10-8 installed
dejavu-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed
dejavu-fonts-experimental.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed
dejavu-lgc-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed
Available Packages
freefont.noarch 20060126-4.fc7 development
Vera.ttf: "Bitstream Vera Sans" "Roman" <<-- x86_64
DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" <<-- i386
Expected results:
Same font on both architectures, given same fonts installed.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 450709] New: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: rdtennent(a)hotmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com,roozbeh(a)farsiweb.info
Description of problem:
When I start up fontforge, I get the following error message:
Help! Server claimed font
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--26-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing.
I may crash soon.
Segmentation fault
I've never see this behavior before.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20080309-1.fc9
How reproducible:
every time, on three different F9 systems
Steps to Reproduce:
1.start fontforge
2.
3.
Actual results: as above
Expected results: fontforge opens
Additional info:
% xlsfonts | grep "ibm-courier"
-ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard
-ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0
-ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
-ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1
-ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3
-ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9
-ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard
-ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0
-ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
-ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1
-ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3
-ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9
-ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard
-ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0
-ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
-ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1
-ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3
-ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3
-ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9
% fc-list "Courier 10 Pitch"
Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold Italic
Courier 10 Pitch:style=Italic
Courier 10 Pitch:style=Regular
Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 10 months
[Bug 462041] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041
Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be
inputted.
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, roozbeh(a)gmail.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 462038
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #462038 +++
Description of problem:
#1: Hotkeys are not responded.
#2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal.
2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F.
3. Observe symptom #1.
4. Select View > Goto from menu.
5. Try to input something in the input field.
6. Observe symptom #2.
Actual results:
#1. No response.
#2. Couldn't be inputted.
Expected results:
#1. File sub-menu pops up.
#2. Data is inputted in field.
Additional info:
HEAD of F9 has same issue as well.
--- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-09-12 02:26:49 EDT ---
`LANG=C fontforge [FILE]` resolves as workaround.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 462038] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038
Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be
inputted.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
#1: Hotkeys are not responded.
#2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal.
2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F.
3. Observe symptom #1.
4. Select View > Goto from menu.
5. Try to input something in the input field.
6. Observe symptom #2.
Actual results:
#1. No response.
#2. Couldn't be inputted.
Expected results:
#1. File sub-menu pops up.
#2. Data is inputted in field.
Additional info:
HEAD of F9 has same issue as well.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 458951] New: [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458951
Summary: [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by
fontconfig
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
One of the scripts used for representing Sindhi language is Devanagari.
Although the fonts for Devanagari are installed, fontconfig does not recognize
them as Sindhi fonts.
This is because there is no snd.orth file for Sindhi language.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 444563] New: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563
Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and
followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When 0D2F is combined with a conjunct/consonant and followed by 0D15, instead of
conjunct/consonant combining with 0D2F, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit, type 0D07, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15,
0D3E, 0D30, 0D4D, 200D
Actual results:
When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15,
0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15
Expected results:
When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15,
0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24 should get combined with 0D2F.
Additional info:
For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 444559] New: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa)
in a word
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) is used in a word, the alignment is
wrong, ie, the whole word do not appear to be in one line, looks as if its in a
zig-zag shape. The vowels used with conjunct also is in wrong alignment
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. In gedit type any consonant, say 0D2C
2. Followed by, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D3F, 0D1F, 0D4D, 0D1F, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D
Actual results:
When above steps are executed, the glyph formed using 0D2C, 0D4D, 0D30,0D3F in
the above word is not in alignment with the whole word
Expected results:
The whole word must be in a single line in same alignment and with no zig-zag shape.
Additional info:
For ref: see screenshot attached on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016, in comment#65
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 431029] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct
'ന്റ'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: icu
AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,fedora(a)leemhuis.info
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #402331 +++
Description of problem:
In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']'
and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct '
ന്റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key
'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the
conjunct ന്റ.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Actual results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Expected results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift
J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result must be ന്റ.
Additional info:
-- Additional comment from aalam(a)redhat.com on 2007-12-14 01:28 EST --
fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST --
Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be
fixed immediately before next release.
This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST --
Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be
fixed immediately before next release.
This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 02:17 EST --
Ani,this appears to be working fine in f8. Can you please confirm the problem?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 04:20 EST --
Created an attachment (id=291249)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291249&action=view)
Screen shot for the conjunct combination
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 03:20 EST --
Rahul, we had a personal discussion on this bug last week. Is the issue clear
for you or do you still have any doubts?
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 07:43 EST --
Ani, thanks for the concern. The problem is absolutely clear to me. It also has
a relation the other bug about chillaksharam right now.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:41 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292509)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292509&action=view)
patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd
This patch fixes the ligature rule in the .sfd file.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:44 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292510)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292510&action=view)
fixed ttf file
Ani, can you please test this font file before I build it for fedora?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:10 EST --
Rahul ,
I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key
sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used.
Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct.
Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct.
Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5
Let me know if any more queries.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:22 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292624)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292624&action=view)
Screenshot of the glyph of the conjunct
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:23 EST --
Rahul ,
I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key
sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used.
Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct.
Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct.
Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5
Let me know if any more queries.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:25 EST --
Please ignore the comment #12 as its a repetition of comment #10. Instead please
have a look in the follwing:
Rahul,
One more thing I would like to mention is that, now as the chillu is not working
anywhere, currently 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 is also not giving the conjunct. I
have already showed you the glyph of the conjunct in the font file. have
attached the same as in comment #11
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:08 EST --
Ani, from the screenshot in comment #5 attached by you, I assume you do not want
the conjunct to be formed for 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31?
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292633)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292633&action=view)
patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd
This patch fixes the ligature rule in sfd file.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292634)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292634&action=view)
fixed ttf file
Ani, can you please test this font file now?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 23:39 EST --
Rahul,
Yes, its working fine. Good job.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-25 07:04 EST --
Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.1.8-1.fc9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months