[Bug 452782] New: [liberation-fonts] Quality Check between initial 1.03 and latest dist.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452782
Summary: [liberation-fonts] Quality Check between initial 1.03
and latest dist.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs-
list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The glyphs in latest version should be same as initial ver 1.03 from manufacturer.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.03.beta2
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install liberation-fonts initial ver 1.03 from
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1...
to /usr/share/fonts/liberation.
2. Load attached word file in gnome.
3. Run fc-cache in /usr/share/fonts/liberation.
4. Capture screenshots on each font.
5. Install liberation-fonts ver 1.04.beta from
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1...
to /usr/share/fonts/liberation
6. Load attached word file in gnome.
7. Run fc-cache in /usr/share/fonts/liberation.
8. Capture screenshots on each font.
9. Use GIMP to stack pictures as pairs by font.
10.Compare the results.
Actual results:
Some glyphs have displacement by 1 pixel.
Expected results:
All glyphs are identical.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-06-25 15:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Informal package review:
> ========================
> -Summary: Andika SIL fonts
> +Summary: Andika is a sans serif font designed for literacy use and for
> beginning readers
>
> * No need to be so brief, ~80 chars are usually ok for rpmlint.
Actually rpmlint has a 79 column limit and your proposal is 80
Though I suppose
“A SIL sans serif font designed for literacy use and for beginning readers”
would be fine
> -* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
> -- 1.0-1
> -Ṑ Initial packaging
> +* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> - 1.0-1
the rpm maintainers will tell you anything after the mail is garbage (but it's a
common mistake, even if the guidelines authorize both)
> +- Initial packaging
You'll take unicode out of my dead hands :) changelog is and always been UTF-8
> Seems good to me.
Thanks for the review, care to do an official one?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-06-25 14:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Does anyone mailed our legal, yet? Can I do so?
You can but blocking on FE-Legal is supposed to be sufficient
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663
------- Additional Comments From mnowak(a)redhat.com 2008-06-25 14:19 EST -------
Informal package review:
========================
-Summary: Andika SIL fonts
+Summary: Andika is a sans serif font designed for literacy use and for
beginning readers
* No need to be so brief, ~80 chars are usually ok for rpmlint.
-* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
-- 1.0-1
-Ṑ Initial packaging
+* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> - 1.0-1
+- Initial packaging
+
* Just indenting and ascii-sation.
--
Seems good to me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months