[Bug 477462] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: tetex-font-kerkis
AssignedTo: paskalis(a)di.uoa.gr
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paskalis(a)di.uoa.gr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 477425] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: mgopen-fonts
AssignedTo: paskalis(a)di.uoa.gr
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paskalis(a)di.uoa.gr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 477461] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: tetex-font-cm-lgc
AssignedTo: paskalis(a)di.uoa.gr
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paskalis(a)di.uoa.gr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 435549] New: obsolete with ghostscript-8.62
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435549
Summary: obsolete with ghostscript-8.62
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: http://www.ghostscript.com
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: urw-fonts
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: xose.vazquez(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
ghostscript-8.62 changelog:
Not strictly a compatibility issue, but the default URW (GPL) fonts are now
distributed in the Resource/Font/ path which can increase the number of file
handles open for PostScript that opens all of the resources. Also the size of
the %rom% rom file system within the executable when using COMPILE_INITS=1 is
larger by the amount needed for the fonts.
-thanks-
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 477468] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: tiresias-fonts
AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 477457] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: silkscreen-fonts
AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 471538] New: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538
Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: bombayvdmo(a)yahoo.com.mx
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
$ rpm -q fontfoge
fontforge-20080309-1.fc9.i386
How reproducible:
Open some .otf file
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open FontForge
2. Select some of attached .otf files.
Actual results:
FontForge Abort
Expected results:
Continue Running
Additional info:
Boisik.otf : http://mitek.webpark.cz/boisik/
cmunvi.otf :
ftp://canopus.iacp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/cm_unicode/cm-unicode-0.6.3a-otf.tar.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 448078] New: [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078
Summary: [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: smc-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs-
list@redhat.com,rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
The default size of Meera is small compared to all other fonts. Meera is one of
the fonts in the smc-fonts package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 450980] New: Unable to install pango-devel for i386 and x86_64 at the same time
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450980
Summary: Unable to install pango-devel for i386 and x86_64 at the
same time
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mpupat(a)free.fr
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
>From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080416 Fedora/2.0.0.14-1.fc8 Firefox/2.0.0.14
Description of problem:
When trying to install pango-devel.i386 with pango-devel.x86_64 already installed I got:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoEngineLang.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoEngineShape.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoFcDecoder.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoFcFont.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoFcFontMap.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoMarkupFormat.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoRenderer.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.10.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.12.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.14.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.16.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.18.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.2.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.4.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.6.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.8.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-all.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-deprecated.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-ATSUI-Fonts.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Cairo-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Coverage-Maps.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Engines.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Fonts.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-FreeType-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Glyph-Storage.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Layout-Objects.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Miscellaneous-Utilities.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Modules.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-OpenType-Font-Handling.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Scripts.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Tab-Stops.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Text-Attributes.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Text-Processing.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Version-Checking.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Vertical-Text.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Win32-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-X-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Xft-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-querymodules.html from install of pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.18.4-1.fc8.x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.18.4-1.fc8
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
yum install pango-devel.x86_64
yum install pango-devel.i386
Actual Results:
Expected Results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 434647] New: X server segfaults in libXfont fs_cleanup_bfont()
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434647
Summary: X server segfaults in libXfont fs_cleanup_bfont()
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: low
Component: libXfont
AssignedTo: sandmann(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: trq(a)astro.washington.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The X server dies with a segmentation fault. Here is the backtrace:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80c2f01]
1: [0x110420]
2: /usr/lib/libXfont.so.1 [0xa56d14]
3: /usr/lib/libXfont.so.1 [0xa573ff]
4: /usr/lib/libXfont.so.1 [0xa594ae]
5: /usr/lib/libXfont.so.1 [0xa59647]
6: /usr/bin/X(FontWakeup+0x4d) [0x808920d]
7: /usr/bin/X(WakeupHandler+0x59) [0x808c959]
8: /usr/bin/X(WaitForSomething+0x1ae) [0x81b64be]
9: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x8d) [0x80886fd]
10: /usr/bin/X(main+0x49a) [0x807054a]
11: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0x884390]
12: /usr/bin/X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1f1) [0x806f831]
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting
Here is symbol information for libXfont:
0xa56d14 <fs_cleanup_bfont+20>: mov 0x78(%eax),%edi
0xa573ff <fs_abort_blockrec+143>: lea 0x20(%esi),%eax
0xa594ae <_fs_check_reconnect+142>: mov 0x6c(%edi),%esi
0xa59647 <fs_wakeup+215>: jmp 0xa595c6 <fs_wakeup+86>
0xa56d14 is in fs_cleanup_bfont (fserve.c:563).
558 {
559 FSFontDataRec *fsd;
560
561 if (bfont->pfont)
562 {
563 fsd = (FSFontDataRec *) bfont->pfont->fpePrivate;
564
565 /* make sure the FS knows we choked on it */
566 fs_send_close_font(bfont->pfont->fpe, bfont->fontid);
567
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Name : libXfont
Arch : i386
Version: 1.3.1
Release: 2.fc8
How reproducible:
I'm not sure how to reproduce it, although it seems to correlate with use of
firefox. The crash happens about every other day since an update in mid February.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 5 months