Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance@redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael@gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: petersen@redhat.com, cchance@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Classification: Fedora
One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages:
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
[...]
Further information:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnershi... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
The script to find unowned directories is not complete yet, but still quite usable: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/dircheck-remote.py $ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^baekmuk-ttf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net 2009-01-30 15:38:03 EDT --- => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ghostscript provided by: ghostscript-8.63-4.fc10.i386 /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-01-30 16:30:57 EDT --- 1. The -common subpackage is missing the %{_fontdir} line of the template 2. the gs stuff should probably be moved in a subpackage that depends on ghostscript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-01-30 16:32:10 EDT --- (more accurately the %dir %{_fontdir} line)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-02 21:13:28 EDT --- 1 & 2 have been resolved:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81270
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net 2009-04-01 06:32:14 EDT --- Should all these packages depend on the "fontpackages-filesystem" package? That one provides four directories needed here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-04-01 06:48:38 EDT --- If the official template is respected the font subpackages depend on the common subpackage and the common subpackage depends on fontpackages-filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE |
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net 2009-04-01 06:56:53 EDT --- Then there's a missing dep in "baekmuk-ttf-fonts", because the following unowned directories are found:
$ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^baekmuk [...] => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-05-05 01:30:24 EDT --- done
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=96998
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org