http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470
Summary: conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: conf AssignedTo: keithp@keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
As explained in http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2008-October/003030.html
conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation
Can it be moved somewhere in /usr/share?
We'd like to make font packages use the conf.d/conf.avail split in Fedora 11 but our package auditing tools do not like an /etc/fonts/conf.avail read-only directory at all, strongly hinting the current default should be changed.
And if it has to be changed we'd rather it was changed before scores of packages depend on the current default.
Fedora 11 packaging cycle will open soonish.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freedesktop@behdad.org Summary|conf.avail can be considered|/etc/…/conf.avail can be |an FHS violation |considered an FHS violation
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2008-11-14 08:15:57 PST --- If we could have an opinion on the correct directory name that would un-block our font guideline change process started there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470
Akira TAGOH akira@tagoh.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|keithp@keithp.com |fontconfig-bugs@lists.freed | |esktop.org QAContact| |freedesktop@behdad.org CC| |akira@tagoh.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470
Akira TAGOH akira@tagoh.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH akira@tagoh.org 2012-04-09 00:46:08 UTC ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 29341 ***
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org