Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net 2009-01-30 15:38:03 EDT --- => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ghostscript provided by: ghostscript-8.63-4.fc10.i386 /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf
=> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf