https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628812
Bug ID: 1628812
Summary: typo in 66-google-noto-mono.conf
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: google-noto-fonts
Keywords: EasyFix, i18n
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Noto Mono should be monospaced font though, 66-google-noto-mono.conf made an
alias for sans-serif. that should be monospace.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20161022-8.fc29
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636511
Bug ID: 1636511
Summary: update to 2017-09-19 release
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: google-noto-fonts
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I think we should update F28-F29 from the current 20161022 snapshot to
the latest stable 2017-09-19 release.
https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/releases/tag/v2017-09-19-phase3-se…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449166
Bug ID: 1449166
Summary: Shape for Serbian Cyrillic BE Wrong
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rosella.capriotti(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1277346
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1277346&action=edit
DELTA and Serbian BE in Liberation 2
Description of problem:
On Lubuntu 17.04 & Libreoffice 5.3.1.2, the shape of Serbian Cyrillic BE in
Liberation Serif v.2 looks uncannily like Greek DELTA. The shape in version 1
seems to me more appropriate.
I added two attachments for the two versions of Liberation Serif: on both Greek
DELTA is on the right for the sake of comparison.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530061
Bug ID: 1530061
Summary: Add support for ligatures for liberation-serif font
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jakob.jakobson13(a)posteo.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Dear developers,
it would be nice if the liberation-serif font would support ligatures as this
looks nicer in longer texts.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564762
Bug ID: 1564762
Summary: texlive-sourcecodepro also has the same fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts
Assignee: mattrose(a)folkwolf.net
Reporter: hvtaifwkbgefbaei(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jamielinux(a)fedoraproject.org, mattrose(a)folkwolf.net
Description of problem:
texlive-sourcecodepro also has the same fonts.
Having these fonts in one package is enough.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
adobe-source-code-pro-fonts-2.030.1.050-3.fc27.noarch
texlive-sourcecodepro-svn40597-37.fc27.5.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564719
Bug ID: 1564719
Summary: hinting of "ti" ligature does not match other letters,
x-height is slightly too low
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: lato-fonts
Assignee: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com
Reporter: dcallagh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com, piotr1212(a)gmail.com
Created attachment 1418442
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1418442&action=edit
screenshot
I noticed this after upgrading Fedora 26->27, specifically from:
freetype-2.7.1-10.fc26.x86_64
lato-fonts-2.015-3.fc26.noarch
to:
freetype-2.8-8.fc27.x86_64
lato-fonts-2.015-4.fc27.noarch
Not sure if the problem is in Freetype or the Lato font. Rendering of all fonts
on my system changed visibly after upgrading, but Lato in particular changed
quite noticeably. However the only problem seems to be with the "ti" ligature
in Lato, so I assume it is some wrong/missing hinting data on that ligature. I
don't see any problem with other ligatures like "fi".
Screenshot showing the problem is attached.
This is using Lato, size 12, as my GTK UI font in Xorg:
$ xrdb -q | grep Xft
Xft.antialias: 1
Xft.hinting: 1
Xft.hintstyle: hintslight
Xft.rgba: rgb
Xft.dpi: 110
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1516939
Bug ID: 1516939
Summary: firefox from fedora and latest nightly misrenders the
square brackets in the math display
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: freetype
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: shlomif(a)shlomifish.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
firefox from fedora and latest nightly (59.0a1) misrenders the square brackets
in the math display here: http://www.shlomifish.org/MathVentures/dodeca.html .
Tested both in a new firefox profile - it happens there too. It doesn't happen
on my mageia 7 x86-64 system. I am using Xfce here.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 27 x86-64.
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to the URL.
2. Scroll down to the formulae with the square brackets.
3.
Actual results:
The square brackets are not high enough.
Expected results:
They should be the right height.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526143
Bug ID: 1526143
Summary: CVE-2017-17521 fontforge: Command injetion in help
function uiutil.c [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: fontforge
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other,
you may clone this bug as appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532027
Bug ID: 1532027
Summary: ecolier-court-fonts subpackages are swapped
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: ecolier-court-fonts
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk
Description of problem:
ecolier-court-fonts actually contains Écolier lignes court.
ecolier-court-lignes-fonts actually contains Écolier court.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-23.fc27.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install ecolier-court-fonts.
Actual results:
You get the lignes variant.
Expected results:
You get the variant without the lines.
Additional info:
And vice-versa, if you actually want the lines variant, e.g., to teach or learn
French handwriting.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498269
Bug ID: 1498269
Summary: Noto Color Emoji and Noto Emoji fixed fonts cause a X
error in a tcl/tk script
Product: Fedora
Version: 26
Component: google-noto-fonts
Severity: high
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jlc(a)cfl.rr.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1333924
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1333924&action=edit
test script do demonistrate emoji fix font causing an X error
Description of problem:
The NCID (Network Caller ID) client is written in tcl/tk. When the
google-noto-emoji-fonts became part of the standard install for Fedora, the
ncid client would cause an X error and crash every time it scanned for fixed
fonts. The attached script was written to determine and verify the problem.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
google-noto-emoji-fonts-20170827-1.fc26.noarch
How reproducible:
Reproducible every time test script run on Fedora 26 and also Fedora 25.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run attached test script
2.
3.
Actual results:
X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib
length error)
Major opcode of failed request: 138 (RENDER)
Minor opcode of failed request: 20 (RenderAddGlyphs)
Serial number of failed request: 476
Current serial number in output stream: 539
Expected results:
Expected script not to cause an X error and crash.
Additional info:
Uncomment the two Noto Emoji font lines in testfonts.tk to not get the X error.
The bug is also reported at https://core.tcl.tk/tk/tktview/3767882e066523dc9ae4
but it is considered a font problem not a tk problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545149
Bug ID: 1545149
Summary: OTF/CFF conts no longer hinted horizontally
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: freetype
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ossman(a)cendio.se
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
I upgraded from Fedora 26 to Fedora 27 and all of a sudden OTF/CFF fonts such
as Cantarell are no longer hinted horizontally, making them appear blurry and
out of focus.
A similar change was done for TTF fonts previously, but that could be reverted
by setting "FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35".
Is there a similar setting hidden for this latest change? The normal font
hinting settings have no effect on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427550
Bug ID: 1427550
Summary: Adding additional Glyphs in Tamil
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: lohit-tamil-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: nsesha92(a)yahoo.co.in
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1258398
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1258398&action=edit
Svarita Deerga Svarita Anudatta eg
Description of problem:
This is not a bug, but enhancement request.
Tamil language script is also used for writing other language text such as
Sanskrit, Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu and Kannada in the form of transliteration.
However Tamil script and the associated Unicode range U0B80-U0BFF does not
contain many characters that are available in these other languages - mainly
the Devanagari Extended unicode UA8E0 and Devanagari Vedic
Extentions unicode U1CD0 series.
Some such requests that I have come across in my FB and other groups:
1. How can I include the signs like lines above the letters as shown in the
picture. This is required to show the swaram i.e. high or low pitch of
pronouncing the letter/word as in Sanskrit. This kind of lines are used in
Sanskrit also.
2. I need to type musical notations in Tamil Using MSword processor. To
indicate octave we put a dot on top or bottom of the letter. how to add ?
--- My answer for above point 2: dot above = anuswara, dot below = nukta, Lohit
Tamil does not contain nukta, but includes anuswara (U+0B82). ---
While its lot easier to juggle around in Linux based systems by switching
between different fonts, its very difficult in MS based applications.
Hence, I am requesting that 9 such frequently used Glyphs be 'added' to the
existing Lohit Tamil font. The existing Glyphs from Lohit-Devanagari.ttf can be
'leveraged' for this, no need to reinvent the wheel.
Replace:
U+0310 COMBINING CANDRABINDU >>> replace with VEDIC TONE CANDRABINDU /
anunasika U+0901, thats in Devanagari range, to be consistent with all other
scrips.
Add:
Signs:
Visarga U+0903 ( as separate and distinct, in addition to Tamil Visarga U+0B83
)
AVAGRAHA U+093D
CANDRABINDU VIRAMA U+A8F3
Combining signs/marks with Anchoring:
NUKTA U+093C
VEDIC TONE UDATTA / SVARITA U+0951
VEDIC TONE ANUDATTA U+0952
VEDIC TONE PRENKHA U+1CD2
VEDIC TONE DOUBLE/Deerga SVARITA U+1CDA
VEDIC TONE CANDRA U+1CF4
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Not a bug, but enhancement request.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533798
Bug ID: 1533798
Summary: Support Bitcoin sign
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: shanshandehongxing(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Unicode added Bitcoin sign (₿) in June 2017, and Microsoft gave update package
to make Windows 10 support this sign, thus this sign become available in Arial,
Calibri, Cambria, Consolas, Courier New, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI, Tahoma
and Times New Roman. So I hope this sign become available in Liberation fonts
as well.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607997
Bug ID: 1607997
Summary: Newer versions available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: google-croscore-fonts
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rastus.vernon(a)protonmail.ch
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Fedora has Arimo 1.23, Cousine 1.20 and Tinos 1.23. Arimo 1.32, Cousine 1.22
and Tinos 1.32 are available from
https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/tree/master/hinted. Arimo has 708 new
glyphs and Tinos has 706.
It would be nice to have the newer versions in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628832
Bug ID: 1628832
Summary: Package cleanup required
Product: Fedora
Version: 28
Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts
Severity: high
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Description of problem:
At the moment 75 otf/ttf fonts has been packaged in single RPM.
Improvement required.
1. Keep on .otf, remote .ttf. Its duplication.
2. Make two suppackages
a) Montserrat-*
b) MontserratAlternates-*
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-7.200-2.fc28.noarch
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See fonts installed under ulietaula-montserrat-fonts
2.
3.
Actual results:
1. It installing both ttf and otf.
2 2 families are installed under same packages.
Expected results:
1. We do not required .ttf.
2. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
for subpackaging.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643607
Bug ID: 1643607
Summary: julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts uninstallable
Product: Fedora
Version: 28
Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: phil(a)fifi.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Description of problem:
julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts cannot be installed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts-1:7.200-4.fc28.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts
Actual results:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common = 7.200-4.fc28 needed
by julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts-1:7.200-4.fc28.noarch
Expected results:
julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts should be installed.
Additional info:
It seems that the dependency on julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common is missing
the epoch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579464
Bug ID: 1579464
Summary: update breaks boot
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fontconfig
Severity: high
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: contactopublico57(a)bol.com.br
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:dnf update to fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64 produces
boot failure.
Additional package updates produce boot failure as noted below.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64
How reproducible:
dnf update fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64
Steps to Reproduce:
1.dnf system update
2.
3.
Actual results:
dnf update installs fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64
reboot results in boot failure prior to loading lightdm-1.25.2-1.fc29.x86_64
with mate-desktop-1.20.1-5.fc29.x86_64.
Expected results:
boot to lightdm login manager/mate desktop
Additional info:
same behavior with dnf update of following additional packages:
harfbuzz-1.7.5-3.fc29.x86_64
harfbuzz-icu-1.7.5-3.fc29.x86_64
Please advise if you need a separate bug report for the harfbuzz packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644700
Bug ID: 1644700
Summary: freetype with subpixel rendering enabled should
Obsolete freetype-freeworld
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: freetype
Severity: low
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Please add:
Obsoletes: freetype-freeworld < …
for upgrade path from RPM Fusion Free.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.9.1-5.fc29
freetype-2.9.1-5.fc30
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639379
Bug ID: 1639379
Summary: freetype-devel transaction check fails for multilib
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: freetype
Severity: medium
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jman012345(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When attempting to upgrade from Fedora 28 to 29, the 64-bit version of
freetype-devel conflicts with the 32-bit version.
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/bin/freetype-config conflicts between attempted installs of
freetype-devel-2.9.1-2.fc29.i686 and freetype-devel-2.9.1-2.fc29.x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.9.1-2
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. From a fully updated Fedora 28 system: sudo dnf system-upgrade download
--releasever=29
2. Confirm packages to download and confirm gpg keys
3. Transaction check failure
Actual results:
Transaction check fails
Expected results:
Transaction check succeeds
Additional info:
Currently installed version of freetype-devel is 2.8-10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642743
Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed| |2018-10-29 12:31:01
--- Comment #3 from Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1639379 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642743
Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ajax(a)redhat.com,
| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |jmracek(a)redhat.com,
| |john.j5live(a)gmail.com,
| |kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
| |mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
| |mclasen(a)redhat.com,
| |mkasik(a)redhat.com,
| |rhughes(a)redhat.com,
| |rstrode(a)redhat.com,
| |sandmann(a)redhat.com
Component|dnf-plugin-system-upgrade |freetype
Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |mkasik(a)redhat.com
|.org |
--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> ---
It looks like a packaging problem. The conflict between arch or rename of
binary should help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642082
Bug ID: 1642082
Summary: fonttools-3.31.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fonttools
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 3.31.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.29.0-1.fc29
URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641503
Bug ID: 1641503
Summary: sil-andika-fonts-5.000.zip is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: sil-andika-fonts
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Latest upstream release: 5.000.zip
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.0-20.fc29
URL: https://software.sil.org/andika/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/4816/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336042
Bug ID: 1336042
Summary: Liberation Fonts not displayed correctly
Product: Fedora
Version: 24
Component: liberation-fonts
Severity: high
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: freepenguin84(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1157360
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1157360&action=edit
Screenshots to show the difference between Fedora 22 and 23/24
Description of problem:
Liberation Fonts are not being diplayed correctly. This is obvious on websites
where the text is shifted some pixel up compared to Fedora 22 and other OSes.
Fedora 23 has the same issue.
The source files for liberation font is the same in Fedora 22-24 but the output
*.ttf files are different. Installing the RPMs from Fedora 22 in Fedora 24
fixes the problem. Maybe the output has changed due to updated build tools?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.07.4
How reproducible:
Open Webpage in Firefox or Google Chrome
Steps to Reproduce:
Open https://github.com/solus-project/budgie-desktop in Firefox
Actual results:
Text is shifted upwards besides the images (see attached screenshot)
Expected results:
Text aligned with images (see attached screenshot)
Additional info:
https://plus.google.com/+ViktorPankraz/posts/L8KVUGEbHxz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640809
Bug ID: 1640809
Summary: Freetype-devel conflicts when having both the x86 and
x64 version installed
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: freetype
Severity: high
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: securetalk(a)sbmobilepilot.onmicrosoft.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
This bug blocks updating to Fedora 29 when affected with it, unless
freetype-devel.i686 is removed before upgrading to F29.
It's not present on prior releases and prevents building some SW properly too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634245
Bug ID: 1634245
Summary: fontconfig-2.12.91 caused wqy-zeihei-fonts lost it's
Chinese font name in `fc-list` output
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: lovetide(a)qq.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
After I upgraded to Fedora 28 from Fedora 27, I found the font displayed in my
MATE desktop is not what I configured before, so I try to reconfigured, but I
can't found the font name "文泉驿点阵正黑" anymore, (this made Chinese characters in
images generated by gnuplot ("文泉驿点阵正黑" font named specifed) unreadable), but I
do found it's alternative font name "WenQuanYi Zei Hei Sharp".
Also, I tried the recent released Fedora 29 Beta live CD, same issue still
exists.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.12.91-1.fc28 +
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot from Fedora 28 or Fedora 29 Beta Live CD, and config the network to
make sure it can access internet.
2. Install wqy-zenhei-fonts (issue `su` then `dnf install wqy-zenhei-fonts` in
terminal)
3. Issue `LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 fc-list | grep -i wqy-zenhei.ttc`
Actual results:
# fc-list | grep -i wqy-zenhei.ttc
/usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: WenQuanYi Zen Hei:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: WenQuanYi Zen Hei
Sharp,文泉驛點陣正黑:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: WenQuanYi Zen Hei
Mono:style=Regular
Expected results:
(this is from Fedora 27, with fontconfig 2.12.6-4.fc27)
# fc-list | grep -i wqy-zenhei.ttc
/usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: 文泉驿点阵正黑,文泉驛點陣正黑,WenQuanYi Zen Hei
Sharp:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: 文泉驿等宽正黑,文泉驛等寬正黑,WenQuanYi Zen Hei
Mono:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: 文泉驿正黑,文泉驛正黑,WenQuanYi Zen
Hei:style=Regular
Additional info:
* Fedora 27 does not have this issue. Lastest fontconfig version in Fedora 27
is 2.12.6-4.fc27
* Fedora 29 Live CD still have this issue
* Interesting thing, adobe-source-han-sans-cn font is not affected:
# fc-list | grep -i 思源黑体
...
/usr/share/fonts/adobe-source-han-sans-cn/SourceHanSansCN-Normal.otf: 思源黑体
CN,Source Han Sans CN Normal,Source Han Sans CN:style=Normal,Regular
...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634872
Bug ID: 1634872
Summary: woffTools: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+:
python2-woffTools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: woffTools
Assignee: sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cstratak(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
ngompa13(a)gmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
pviktori(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com,
zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl
Blocks: 1625773 (PY2REMOVAL)
In line with the Mass Python 2 Package Removal [0], the following (sub)packages
of woffTools were marked for removal:
* python2-woffTools
According to our query, those (sub)packages only provide a Python 2 importable
module. If this is not true, please tell us why, so we can fix our query.
Please remove them from your package.
As said in the change document, if there is no objection in a week, we will
remove the package(s) as soon as we get to it. This change might not match your
packaging style, so we'd prefer if you did the change. If you need more time,
please let us know here.
We hope this doesn't come to you as a surprise. If you want to know our
motivation for this, please read the change document [0].
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625773
[Bug 1625773] Mass Python 2 Package Removal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380754
Bug ID: 1380754
Summary: Missing kerning pair for the Czech language ďá
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mcepl(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1206277
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1206277&action=edit
illustration of the problem
Description of problem:
This is just to record the unfortunate missing kerning pair for ďá (used in
Czech, for example “devil” is “ďábel”). I will try to investigate which other
kerning pairs are missing.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts-1.045-12.el7.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1.print the standard Czech pangram “Příliš žluťoučký kůň úpěl ďábelské ódy.”
2.
3.
Actual results:
space between ď and á in the word “ďábelské” is awful
Expected results:
It shouldn't be
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN
data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: qt
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, than(a)redhat.com,
kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, ltinkl(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 182235,473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe
CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license
This data is embeded in many packages, including yours
Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
package
FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side
See also
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553702
Bug ID: 1553702
Summary: Digit zero with an oblique strike instead of inside
dot
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mailinglists35(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I'd wish to have a version of the monospaced font (Liberation Mono) where digit
zero has an oblique strike instead of inside dot.
The dot version makes it difficult to me to distinguish it from the digit eight
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
looking at the display
Steps to Reproduce:
1. look at digit zero displayed with Liberation Mono font
2.
3.
Actual results:
See a version with a dot in the middle of the shape
Expected results:
See a version with an oblique strike crossing the shape
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.