https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496761
Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
| |pnemade(a)redhat.com
Component|gnome-themes-standard |fontconfig
Fixed In Version| |fontconfig-2.12.6-3.fc27
| |fontconfig-2.12.6-3.fc26
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Assignee|ignatenko(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com
Last Closed|2017-10-09 16:00:01 |2017-11-06 10:56:55
--- Comment #15 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #9)
> (In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #2)
> > I sent an upstream patch to the list about this:
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2017-October/thread.html
>
> Really? Where?
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/commit/?id=c41c9220181b203d1cf1f643…
> I hope you don't mind me reopening this for discussion for Fedora 28,
> especially since as far as I can tell Fedora 27 doesn't include a color
> emoji font by default.
That's a bug in gnome-themes-standard, not the bug we're discussing here about
fontconfig.
> As I'm sure you're aware, newer version of the emojione font are not
> redistributable.
We already know, it's written as such in the package spec file:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/eosrei-emojione-fonts.git/tree/eosr…
> I looked at emojitwo today and it looks like it requires
> several grunt/node packages in order to build from source, but the emojitwo
> build documentation is non-existent so I may be wrong.
>
> So it's awkward for distros to package a dead font (emojione) and it's
> difficult for them to package emojitwo.
We know all this, but decided that it was the best solution for this purpose
already. There should be discussions about this on the Fedora Workstation list,
as well as in the GNOME bugzilla and/or wiki. If in doubt about any of those,
I'd be happy repeating those arguments on the fontconfig list, if you send an
email there and CC: me.
Resetting the status of the bug, as the problem in question was already fixed
in an errata.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |puiterwijk(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> ---
(In reply to Peng Wu from comment #2)
>
> Maybe it is okay to keep it in Fedora, and not install by default.
Agreed, I don't think Android Emoji is the best choice to be included by
default.
Patrick Uiterwijk: do you remember the motivation behind commit
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/72d02210013696513644d5671d6ba453cd513921?b…
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
--- Comment #2 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> ---
But some X11 apps can't support color emoji font, we need to provide some black
and white fonts for some X11 apps.
Maybe it is okay to keep it in Fedora, and not install by default.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
--- Comment #1 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> ---
This pull request removes it from the default
install
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/180#request_diff
I think that is good enough, there is no need to drop the package.
By the way, not all color emoji fonts are really up-to-date,
currently only "Noto Color Emoji" seems to have all the Unicode 10.0.0
emoji and render all the sequences from
http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/
correctly.
"Emoji One" lacks all the emoji added in Unicode 10.0.0 and
renders many sequences incorrectly which were already
defined in http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/4.0/ (released
when Unicode 9.0.0 was released).
The best black and white Emoji font currently is Symbola, it has
all the Emoji added in Uniocde 10.0.0 (and very nicely drawn
in my opinion). But it renders *all* Emoji sequences incorrectly.
*And* with the latest fontconfig update, colour emoji fonts are used
by default as long as any of the known colour emoji fonts is installed,
so Symbola would be used only as a fallback when no colour emoji font is
installed or the colour emoji font which is installed lacks some newer emoji.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org, mavit(a)mavit.org.uk
Component|google-noto-emoji-fonts |google-android-emoji-fonts
Assignee|pwu(a)redhat.com |mavit(a)mavit.org.uk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509487
Bug ID: 1509487
Summary: Upstream has gone away for fontpackages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fontpackages
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: mavit(a)mavit.org.uk
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Source0 and wiki page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages direct you to
http://fedorahosted.org/ for the fontpackages source code, but that site’s
no-longer with us. Should a new repository be set up at, say,
https://pagure.io/?
I see that there’s a repository at https://github.com/pnemade/fontpackages that
could be cloned from.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509386
Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506961
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|POST |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed| |2017-11-03 03:47:18
--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> ---
built on rawhide
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=25525
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.