On 08/22/2013 07:20 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote on #fedora-devel:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> The overall results with some comments are at
http://ur1.ca/f5xxw .
The CheckSoFiles results might be .so plug-in libs (extension modules),
which are stored in private paths, i.e. outside run-time linker's search.
Or even non-versioned shared libs ending with .so, but being ordinary
run-time libs (and no build-time libs for optional -devel packages).
Indeed. My
current understanding about this:
- f-r should not be afraid to warn about things. But this test should
not really fail, just inform about the so-files and leave the decision
to user.
- That said, f-r should understand the ocaml and haskell exceptions.
- Likewise, it shouldn't be too hard to exclude private files outside
ld.so's load path.
Moving discussion to fedora-review list,
--alec