On 09/09/2014 09:57 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
I've quickly look at the EPEL meeting minutes from the last
anybody else interesting:
There were some ideas worth bringing to attention that I would try to
16:43:25 <dgilmore> stahnma: not sure we can allow depending of software
Just from a technical POV (not taken into account if we allow that in
Fedora/EPEL/whereever) -- a common use case now is that if some package
depends on some software collection, this package either is build in the
same or in a depended software collection.
However, there are and will be cases where somebody would like to create
a non-SCL RPM depended on a software collection, which is something not
solved properly yet and the solution might be quite different from
collection to collection.
16:47:43 <Evolution> smooge: where's the upstream for scls?
16:47:51 <Evolution> it's damned sure not softwarecollections.org
16:47:52 <smooge> softwarecollections.org
16:48:07 <Evolution> it *should* be that, but it's not.
For the tooling (scl-utils), the upstream is at
For the collections packages (packages with scl macros defined) the
upstream indeed is supposed to be at softwarecollections.org
but I must
admit we are not there yet (it's quite fresh project) -- there are still
pieces missing like RPM sources in git, bug tracking or active
development ahead of already released RHSCL.
But there is definitely not any other upstream url.