Hello EPEL people,
what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
Hello EPEL people,
what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:45 AM Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
Hello EPEL people,
what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.
Yes, please!
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
Hello EPEL people,
what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days
for
EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.
+1
On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com mailto:smooge@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello EPEL people, > > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)? > I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.+1
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com mailto:smooge@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello EPEL people, > > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)? > I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.+1
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
Please file a ticket with infra about it.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com mailto:smooge@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello EPEL people, > > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)? > I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.+1
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
Please file a ticket with infra about it.
wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :)
Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow interested parties to actually see it and comment?
Anyhow, I'm personally fine with it, but note that 3 days leaves very little time for testing. One of those days is likely mirror sync/getting the update, so interested testers would need to update at least every day to make sure and not miss out.
kevin
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:32 PM Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com mailto:smooge@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello EPEL people, > > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)? > I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.+1
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
Please file a ticket with infra about it.
wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :)
Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow interested parties to actually see it and comment?
Anyhow, I'm personally fine with it, but note that 3 days leaves very little time for testing. One of those days is likely mirror sync/getting the update, so interested testers would need to update at least every day to make sure and not miss out.
Considering the state of CentOS Stream 9 and RHEL 9 right now, I'm inclined to consider it at the same stage as branched Fedora. We can always raise it later if we want.
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com mailto:smooge@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello EPEL people, > > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)? > I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.+1
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
Please file a ticket with infra about it.
wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :)
Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow interested parties to actually see it and comment?
+1 to putting this on the agenda for next week's meeting.
Anyhow, I'm personally fine with it, but note that 3 days leaves very little time for testing. One of those days is likely mirror sync/getting the update, so interested testers would need to update at least every day to make sure and not miss out.
kevin _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject... Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 10:32 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
Please file a ticket with infra about it.
wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :)
Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow interested parties to actually see it and comment?
+1, I'm in favor of this but it should be discussed in the meeting for better visibility.
Cheers Davide
Just want to say that this was discussed at the EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
Passed: epel9 will have 7 day and epel9-next will have 3 day waiting period in bodhi. 6 votes for, 0 votes against, 1 abstain
This is valid until RHEL 9 GA. At that time the epel9-next will become the same as epel8-next. Currently epel8-next is 7 days.
Troy
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:45 AM Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com wrote:
On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 10:32 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
Please file a ticket with infra about it.
wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :)
Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow interested parties to actually see it and comment?
+1, I'm in favor of this but it should be discussed in the meeting for better visibility.
Cheers Davide _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject... Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Carl George -
Davide Cavalca -
Kevin Fenzi -
Miro Hrončok -
Neal Gompa -
Stephen John Smoogen -
Troy Dawson