On 09/11/2014 12:31 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Alternatively, is cloud-init an actual shipped RH package
>> should be excluded/blacklisted from epel?
> its certainly used in the RHEL image
Odd. I am not seeing it in any of the normal channels...
at least not by that name.
its in the rhel guest agents, and therefore should be in there somewhere
- but I agree, its either hard to find or just not there. In previous
releases they did the RHCOMMON channel thing, not sure if thats the
intention here as well.
Anyhow, How about we try and get the same pool of people maintaining
both the EPEL one and the CentOS one? Then they might be more easily be
able to keep them in sync. Perhaps we can start an email dialog on
that would work. There is the whole fundamental issue to then work
through as to how far the epel branch's can diverge from the fedora
codebase ? Secondly, could we find a mechanism that takes this model and
applies it across the board on both sides.
that would also make it easier for this use case : Some of the SIG's
might end up needing to carry the epel configs, not just the -release
rpm, but the yum config, enabled already, in their own release files to
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc