Michael Stahnke a écrit :
Our policy is not to step on top of RH offered materials. RHWAS is
offered as a channel is RHN, if I am correct. So, I don't think we
can offer the RPMs that are RHWAS.
That's not what i mean.
I only say :
> I think the packages from EPEL-5 could easily be maintain for an
> repository (using RHEL + RHWAS as references).
So building RPM for "RHEL + RHWAS" users (such as pear and pecl extensions).