On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 03:21:35PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:50:44PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 15:48 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
This shows the minimum changes needed to:
- have openssl3-libs parallel installable with openssl-libs (tested in
mock for x86_64)
- mark the base, devel, and perl subpackages as conflicting
- openssl3 and openssl both ship binaries in %{_bindir} - ditto with openssl3-perl and openssl-perl - openssl3-devel and openssl-devel both ship headers and includes with the same names
And of course I forgot to paste in the commit: https://gitlab.com/michel-slm/openssl3/-/commit/3649e51f898dbe1d97695cd8aca2...
It's been 2 days, so I'm assuming I'm not doing anything insanely silly here. I've put up the package for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2022907
cc:ing Sahana who is driving the OpenSSL 3 migration in Fedora. Sahana, would it make sense to have this in Fedora 34 and 35 as well?
Best regards,
Updating to close the loop: openssl3 is landing in epel8!
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ff6e908f7e
If anyone thinks they need this in Fedora 34 and 35, please let me know, otherwise I'll keep this EPEL8 only for now.
Thanks to Neal Gompa for all the review feedbacks, and everyone here for shooting down the original idea of doing this in the epel8 branch of the main openssl dist-git repo.
Best regards,