Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 17.07.2007 14:52, Joel Andres Granados wrote:
>
>> Joel Andres Granados wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the python-imaging package...
>>> What is the matter with including the 1.1.6 version in EPEL/el5?
>>> does it break anything?
>>> Both Plone and python-docutils (deps in EPEL) use the Image library
>>> from PIL and this library does not have any
>>> backward compatibility issues. additionally, RHEL5-client has no
>>> package that depends on
>>> python-imaging. So I say KISS, and ship 1.1.6 with the EPEL/el5.
>>> I know it goes against the EPEL policies,
>>> but I think its much better that messing with nvr.
>>>
>> And what about EPEL/e4, the EPEL wiki says to use code form fedora
>> core 3.
>>
>
> That the advice, yes.
>
>
>> [...]
>> Moreover, is there an additional way to build EPEL packages.
>> I'm following
>>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo
>> wiki for the builds. Is this correct?
>>
>
> The old Extras procedure applies; e.g. update cvs, run "make tag build";
> koji and bodi, which are used for F-7 and rawhide are not yet used
> for EPEL.
>
^^^^ this is really nice to know, I am familiar with the EPEL way of
doing it. Can you direct me to the
wiki, tutorial or info page.
Thx.
^^^^ this is really nice to know, I am *Not* familiar with the EPEL way
of doing it. Can you direct me to the
wiki, tutorial or info page. is it in