This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010002020006000007050201
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 1/25/2011 12:41 PM, Fred Wittekind wrote:
Are there any plans to to update clamav to 0.96.x in EPEL 5? Are
there
any technical or policy issues holding this up?
There is an bugzilla entry for it here (kinda old):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579370
Does this have something to do with it?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573191
--------------010002020006000007050201
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 1/25/2011 12:41 PM, Fred Wittekind wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D3F0B3F.3040308@twister.dyndns.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Are there any plans to to update clamav to 0.96.x in
EPEL 5? Are there
any technical or policy issues holding this up?
There is an bugzilla entry for it here (kinda old):
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579370">ht...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1"><font face="Arial">Does this have
something to do
with it?<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573191">ht...
</font></font>
</body>
</html>
--------------010002020006000007050201--