On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:25:10 -0500
Greg Swift <gregswift(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If an additional repo is decided to be the way to go, what would it
take to develop a mostly 'complete' list along with a list of existing
howtos or subject matter experts that can be referenced by the poor
soul(s) who volunteer to do the work?
Hard to say until we had such a list. ;)
> And I'm sure there's other issues... it would not be at
all easy,
> and I would prefer to avoid it.
understandably. although at this point I'm wondering a few things:
1: since multiple bits have brought this up and no one has come up
with a better solution, is this the way we need to go?
I'm still not sure. ;)
2: would a single EPEL-supplemental/rolling/fubar meet the needs of
both of these paths?
I don't know. I'd love to hear from those that have cases not handled
by current EPEL.
3: is it possible to do the numbered packages in the same git
repositories without creating a whole separate package path? is it
reasonable?
I don't know. I guess it would need to be 'epel6-rolling' and
'epel5-rolling' as seperate branches in git.
kevin