On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Trevor Hemsley
<trevor.hemsley(a)codefarm.com> wrote:
Without wishing to reopen a can of worms, this should be an
interesting test
of the recently revised EPEL policy on duplicating RH packages since these
are already in RHEMRG. e.g.
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/...
It should not be a can of worms. RHEL-AP does not have Condor. RHE-MRG
does but is not as common as RHEL. In most cases if you are going to
use a sub-channel, you should not add EPEL, RPMforge, etc on that
system without some testing to see what might override X, Y , and Z.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning