On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:19:44 -0600
inode0 <inode0(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Your situation probably explains most of the two large groups where
either we see the same version or we see a lower version lingering in
EPEL.
Why not generate these lists and exclude the packages in question from
the metadata built for architectures where they are included in RHEL?
Yeah, I suppose we could hard code such a list into mash.
I don't think the mash maintainers have time/desire to do this.
Would anyone else be willing to look into it?
kevin