On 07.07.2007 16:32, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 07/07/2007 05:15 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> There isn't many of them, but yum and related packages are in Centos and
>> not in RHEL-4 (unless I am wrong).
> According to the CentOS release notes, you are correct:
> It lists the following as packages which are in CentOS-4 and not in
> 'centos-yumconf' is probably safe to ignore as it is only yum repo
> configs. We should discuss how to deal with the other packages.
I for one am 100% in favor of including them in EPEL. At least because
RH5 uses yum.
+1 (except centos-yumconf of course)
But we should not create trouble for CentOS, so I'm in favor of this,
what was said somewhere else in this thread:
On 07.07.2007 22:58, Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 10:47:25PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> But then EPEL conflicts with Centos.
Why not just track their package with a lower Release?