On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Karsten Wade<kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:24:19AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Note that a while back we discussed if EPEL is in need of a "steering
> comittee" which implies elections and such. We decided that it was much
> more a SIG than a Project. I don't know if that needs to be addressed
> by fesco.
To some degree, this is semantics. Let's instead:
1. Figure out what is broken;
2. How to fix it;
3. Meet regularly to keep stuff on track;
4. Keep a clear set of tasks needed/done.
After that is moving, we can address if anyone needs to volunteer for
summary execution and replacement by a new regime.
Me.. me.. can I get a cool white handkerchief and a hand-rolled
cigarette too? I want to apologize also for the last 6 months. After
November, my free time went to crap. I am working on making more time
available and should hopefully be able to focus more on EPEL also.
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"