On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 February 2016 at 21:01, Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com> wrote:
> It looks like EPEL 5/6 have old versions of scl-utils. Those are probably
> added back at a point when the base OS didn't have them, but they are now
> older versions than what's available in the base OS.
> Should EPEL versions be removed?

I didn't know they were in the base OS but in a side channel. If they
are in the base, then yes we should remove them.

Sorry, maybe I jumped the gun a bit. I actually didn't check if it's in a side channel on RHEL, but was basing these statements on the fact that it's in CentOS:
https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=rpms/scl-utils.git
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/scl-utils-20120927-27.el6_6.x86_64.rpm