On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com>
wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> There are a few exceptions. I do think RHEL is justified in moving Firefox
> to FF3. The reason is twofold -
>
> 1) Firefox has a huge codebase. It would take extreme amount of man power
> to continue to maintain FF 1.x without upstream.
>
> 2) The web evolves quickly, and a browser must keep in touch with modern
> web innovations, particularly in the area of javascript and CSS
> implementation.
>
>
A small addition here; RHEL does so by releasing a minor update to the
entire operating system (5.2) - so everyone knows to look for changes like
these. Is this something EPEL can do as well?
EPEL 5.1/nethack-3.4.3
EPEL 5.2/nethack-4.0 (for the right reasons)
Just a thought.
I think that will imply to add another epel branch.
such as move epel to EL-5.1 and then add EL-5.2
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB