On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 18:54 +0000, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
Without wishing to reopen a can of worms, this should be an
test of the recently revised EPEL policy on duplicating RH packages
since these are already in RHEMRG. e.g.
Indeed, it's a can of worms... In this case both rawhide and F12 has
condor-7.4.1-1 and also RHEL has the 7.4.1 version so that shouldn't be
much of a problem. But I think a lot of trouble can be avoided if the
version pushed to EPEL would have a release number _lower_ then -0.7.1.