On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:06:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Consider:
1. foo rpm that is in the RHEL baseos. It's not in any module.
Can epel make a foo (non default) module that overrides it?
2. foo rpm that is in a RHEL default module.
Can epel make a foo (non default) module that overrides it?
3. foo rpm that is in a RHEL non default module.
Can epel make a foo (non default) module that overrides it?
I think we all agree 3 is fine.
I think 2 could cause problems, but perhaps it would work.
I would think 1 would be fine also.
These should all be fine. In the case of 2, it's just now another alternate
non-default stream. It would only override if explicitly asked for.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader