On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:52 +0200, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote:
Is this some kind of joke ? What is the rationale behind this
actually i
find exim and cyrus very robust pieces of software.
Deprecation and/or non-inclusion in RHEL is not always the result of a
piece of software not being robust. And I say this as a major proponent
of Exim myself, ever since I first deployed it on Debian a good decade
ago (coming from years of Sendmail and Postfix exposure).
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
This question is probably best referred to your TAM.
The epel list seems like the wrong place for it.
Indeed.
Furthermore and just FYI, the RHEL 6 Beta list is here:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list
And the RHEL 6 Beta Announce list is here:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-announce
--
Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat, Inc
Professional Consulting
http://www.redhat.com/consulting
mailto:bjs@redhat.com +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile)
mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org (Blackberry/Red Hat-External)
--------------------------------------------------------
You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100%
no-IP-strings-attached, community software development.
But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other
software and services firms for their own, direct needs,
year after year?
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/