On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Adam Miller
<maxamillion(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> As per the new EPEL policy that was voted on recently, the push of that
> update is not allowed unless there is a justification due to security
> vulnerability.
>
> -Adam (From Android)
Where was this vote? I know I missed a couple of EPEL meetings, was it recently?
It was recent. The basics are:
1) Updates/upgrades are ok as long as they do not break compatibility
or require manual intervention to get working.
2) If an update/upgrade will break the release, the package is
affected by a security problem then an update is allowed if it is
announced and I think, gets a month of testing in epel-testing.
3) Otherwise either a clean fix needs to be made or the package is not
to be upgraded.
And yes this needs to be written up but crap the whole EPEL wiki needs
a rewrite.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning