On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 09:35 +0200, Tuomo Soini wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:31:37 +0000 Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
Hi, Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1] therefore we should find a way that the el8 version be greater than the el8.next version.
[1]
rpmdev-vercmp 1.el8.next 1.el8
1.el8.next > 1.el8
I already suggested adding requirement to do a release bump when building from epel-next to epel.
https://pagure.io/epel/pull-request/259
I find it important that new, compatible with new rhel build has bigger version-release than epel-next build.
I just tested
rpmdev-vercmp 1.el8.next 1.el8 1.el8.next > 1.el8
rpmdev-vercmp 1.el8.next 1.el8.1 1.el8.next < 1.el8.1
so rpmdev-bumpspec --rightmost is enough
-- Tuomo Soini tis@foobar.fi Foobar Linux services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy https://foobar.fi/ -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject... Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue