On 08/03/10 21:00, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:13:01PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Josh Kayse<josh.kayse(a)gtri.gatech.edu>
wrote:
>>
>>> I have recently acquired mod_wsgi commit permissions and am going through
>>> some of the open bugs for it on bugzilla. According to [1], and from my
>>> testing, mod_wsgi and mod_python conflict resulting in apache segfaulting.
>>> The policy currently states that no packages in EPEL may conflict with a
>>> package from Red Hat Base. Technically, mod_wsgi and mod_python conflict
>>> with each other, but mod_python is optional.
>>>
>> Oi this is where lawyers are born.. because it looks like we are going
>> to have enough corner cases that the policy is going to be 10 miles
>> long to cover them all.
>>
>> EPEL packages can Conflict with RHEL-AP packages, but they can't willy
>> nilly replace them. I would rather have an explicit conflict with
>> mod_wsgi and mod_python in packages than have broken systems. Would a
>> Conflicts cause any other issues between two repositories?
>>
>>
> Question: For mod_wsgi/mod_python Can we do something like this (note:
> I don't know what the real apache syntax would be or if it's quite
> possible):
>
> <IfNotModule mod_python.c>
> LoadModule mod_wsgi.so
> </IfNotModule>
>
The syntax would be:
<IfModule !mod_python.c>
LoadModule wsgi_module modules/mod_wsgi.so
</IfModule>
> Note that this can still cause breakage if apache parses mod_python's
> LoadModule after mod_wsgi's though.
>
True, but in the out-of-the-box configuration, mod_python would be
loaded first from /etc/httpd/conf.d/python.conf and then mod_wsgi from
/etc/httpd/conf.d/wsgi.conf based on alphabetical order.
Paul.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
Would there be any opposition to me going ahead and deploying a new
version of mod_wsgi (3.1) with an updated wsgi.conf with this configuration?
BJ, would this be an acceptable resolution to your bug?
-josh
--
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
Don't top post: see