On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:07:30 -0400
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 06:05, Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org>
wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2020 22:29:54 -0600
> Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5/17/20 6:34 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > > I'm trying to do a local build of gtkwave for EPEL-8.
> > >
> > > A koji scratch build somehow works:
> > >
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44609837
> > >
> > > But a local build does not:
> > >
> > > $ mock -r epel-8-x86_64 gtkwave-3.3.104-2.fc31.src.rpm
> > > ...
> > > Error:
> > > Problem: conflicting requests
> > > - package
> > > Judy-devel-1.0.5-18.module_el8.1.0+217+4d875839.i686 is excluded
> > > - package
> > > Judy-devel-1.0.5-18.module_el8.1.0+217+4d875839.x86_64 is
> > > excluded
> > >
> > > Adding a repo with a local build of Judy doesn't help; that gets
> > > excluded too.
> > >
> > > Any clues?
> > >
> > > Paul.
> >
> > Judy-devel appears to be part of the mariadb-devel module.
> > Locally I can do:
> >
> > dnf module enable mariadb-devel
> > dnf install Judy-devel
> >
> > This was discovered with:
> >
> > dnf module provides Judy-devel
> >
> > on RHEL 8.2, though that does not appear to work on CentOS 8.1.
> >
> > For mock, this seems to work:
> >
> > mock -r epel-8-x86_64 --config-opts module_enable=mariadb-devel
> > --config-opts module_enable= gtkwave-3.3.104-2.el8.src.rpm
>
> I tried that and it didn't make any difference for me (building on
> F-31). Maybe I need to wait for CentOS 8.2?
>
>
Hmm do you have the Powertools enabled in that Mock? I see Judy-devel
in the CentOS-8.1 tree in Powertools.
Yes, I'm using vanilla configs straight from mock-core-configs for
this, and that has epel-8-x86_64.cfg, which pulls in centos-8.tpl,
which has the PowerTools repo defined and not disabled.
(I generally use my own configs and don't touch the original ones, so I
know that if I try the original ones from upstream then they should
work as intended)
Note that the error message doesn't say it can't find Judy-devel, it
says that it (and Judy) is/are excluded. I don't know why that is.
Paul.