On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.01.2008 19:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | next testing -> stable move | knurd |
Working on the next move for EPEL4 right now.
> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | EL-updates to the buildsys | mmcgrath |
"rhel4 i386 and x86_64 are synced down and will resync every day. ppc is
going to be, umm, suffering until I figure out how to make the systemid
work. I'll play some more and see what I can do."
mmcgrath, current status?
I believe its been worked out
> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | KojiAndBodhiForEpel | mmcgrath |
Some movements in
> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | permission to use spec files in other projects
> | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc
Does anybody still care? Seems the Board either do not understand what
we/I'm up to or they ignore it.
No one but you sees a problem. It's covered by the CLA. if you want to be
more explicit then you are free to put a license header in each of your
specs. Documenting the wiki would be ok and point at a copy of the CLA should
more than suffice.
> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | broken dep reports go to the list |
Some work from mschwendt; who is in charge for the current dep checker
script? Does it sill work? Should we switch to the one from mschwendt
(the old one from Extras)?
> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | Free discussion around EPEL
* Anybody willing to file bugs for the remaining broken deps (the
report got send to the lis a few days ago)?
* FUDCon report anyone? Or wasn't EPEL discussed there?
epel-devel-list mailing list