On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 6:21 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Packages in the EPEL-8 repository are volunteered by Fedora
via requests by interested users.
If a package you are looking for is not there, please look at
and see if a request has been opened for
your package to be built in EPEL-8.
If it hasn't please open a new ticket.
Some packages may not be able to built in EPEL-8 due to missing deps
which need to be added.
That is the official way to get packages into EPEL 8.
Looks like the owner has already started work on it, but it's still
good to get a bugzilla if there isn't one. I tend to prioritize what
packages I do based on if they have a bugzilla or not.
To be clear, I am a Fedora packager and have supported multiple packages
So my first inclination was not to file a bug for someone else
to do the work. But agreed that the process should be followed.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:41 PM Tim Orling <ticotimo(a)gmail.com>
> Naively cloning f30 branch and performing a local build:
> ant is available as module
> No match for apache-commons, avalon-framework, batik, fontbox,
javapackages-local, junit, qdox, servlet, xmlgraphics-commons, xmlunit
> I guess there's some work to do...
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines