On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:32 PM Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com mailto:smooge@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello EPEL people, > > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)? > I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.
+1
There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo need to approve it a meeting?
Please file a ticket with infra about it.
wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :)
Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow interested parties to actually see it and comment?
Anyhow, I'm personally fine with it, but note that 3 days leaves very little time for testing. One of those days is likely mirror sync/getting the update, so interested testers would need to update at least every day to make sure and not miss out.
Considering the state of CentOS Stream 9 and RHEL 9 right now, I'm inclined to consider it at the same stage as branched Fedora. We can always raise it later if we want.
-- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!