I like that idea. While I do think its cool to run updates and be
pleasantly surprised by brand new versions of software, I can see how
some people might not be so receptive in an enterprise environment.
-Adam
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Bryan J Smith <bjs(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 14:11 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Do we want nagios to be upgraded to 3.0? The 2.x branch is still being
> maintained upstream and we're still using it in Fedora. There would be a
> requirement to change some of the config files, but nothing horrible.
It could always be package labeled as "nagios3" for now, and co-exist
with "nagios" (2.x) until 2.x is no longer developed upstream. Just a
suggestion.
--
Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat GPS SE US
mailto:bjs@redhat.com +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile)
mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org (non-RH/ext to Blackberry)
--------------------------------------------------------
You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100%
no-IP-strings-attached, community software development.
But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other
software and services firms for their own, direct needs?
It's no comparison: http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments