On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:29:17AM -0400, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've
also
> reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard
anything
> back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of
> pdsh. I would be happy to become the maintainer of the EPEL builds for
> pdsh.
If reaching out to them directly isn't getting results, there is the
non-responsive maintainer process:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_packa...
EPEL Packages have a modified version of the non-responsive package
maintainer.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Stalled_EPEL_Re...
This is for stalled requests, which is a bit different than non-responsive
package maintainers. Fedora package maintainers don't have to do anything
with EPEL if they don't want to, thus we needed it to be a bit different.
Troy